Meeting minutes
Infoshare
MichaelC: W3C transition is figuring out who now approves transition requests, etc
MichaelC: Need to encompass multiple reviews
MichaelC: PLH decided to add a few from AC; first mtg Friday
MichaelC: Putting together our process for the mtg
MichaelC: Expect we will have participants unaware of what WAI does
MichaelC: Expect some glitches as we move to the new process
Group coordination https://www.w3.org/WAI/cc/wiki/Group_Coordination
MichaelC: continuing discussion of group coordination proposal
MichaelC: not much discussion, but seems to be general agreement document our approach is good
MichaelC: Notes AG exploring a similar process
MichaelC: Have proposed AG process is similar
https://
janina: RQTF exploring some review stuff, will cross
a couple suggestions in email
janina: Notes that RQTF is expecting to align to WAI in the above
janina: asks about suggestions
MichaelC: suggests reread
Rachael: AG will move go docs and take to refine before returning
MichaelC: when should we invite wider review?
Rachael: phps two weeks?
MichaelC: Suggests we wait for AG return before moving the main process doc
janina: reviews her suggestions ...
janina: master label list for new WAI docs; so that a label could be associated
janina: second a way to tag another group to review based on some certain maturity
MichaelC: need to discuss and consider
jamesn: notes ARIA has an FPWD. What should we now do?
MichaelC: Not yet defined. For now, pub check, send email to waicc once that's ready
Wide review process updates
https://
MichaelC: notes plh had sent to chairs on this point
MichaelC: we should be aware -- substantive changes will need wide review before next wd update
MichaelC: will work on helping get us aware of advance timelines, etc
<Jem> +1
Use of auto transcripts
Jem: raised q because in need of scribe for every mtg
Jem: wondering whether we can use transcripts for mtg minutes
Jem: sometimes helpful for non native speakers
Jem: so q: can we copy and paste from auto translation into irc
MichaelC: first response was no because of concern to not use transcripts as official records
MichaelC: now that we have years of experience, we should consider
MichaelC: we will need to be clear transcript not an official record,
MichaelC: thoughts?
tzviya: notes AB always uses transcripts, but review for people who can't follow; but we never save the record
tzviya: believe the dig wg also cleans up post mtg ...
tzviya: believe this could be helpful
<tzviya> https://
<tzviya> /github.com/w3c/AB-public/issues///github.com/w3c/AB-memberonly/issues
tzviya: notes jitsi being used as an floss alternative to Zoom
tzviya: suggests issue with ab repo for further consideration
jamesn: wonders about recording the meetings; notes that transcipt is saved when mtg is audio recorded
janina: suggests selective makes sense, but phps cleanup post mtg
james: suggests cleanup best during mtg, not post
<Zakim> MichaelC, you wanted to volunteer to raise issue, if nobody else does, after we put together what we want
MichaelC: Willing to raise issue in aB
MichaelC: notes some groups pub'ing to other locations because of issues with standard use of irc
Jem: a highly technical topic can be hard to scribe for non native speaker
janina: wonders how AI works on highly technical auto scribing?
MichaelC: believe jemma'
s use case is compelling and seems most are generally in favor?
MichaelC: suggest i can draft and run by the group ready to file be eow?
MichaelC: will draft an issue we can discuss on list
MichaelC: will draft on email
[no objections on call]
Call time
Rachael: asks AG chairs ?
Rachael: Concerned that chuck and alastair may be unable, as I am frequently unable
MichaelC: that's important