Next Article in Journal
Lake Evolution, Hydrodynamic Outburst Flood Modeling and Sensitivity Analysis in the Central Himalaya: A Case Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Self-Flocculation as an Efficient Method to Harvest Microalgae: A Mini-Review
Previous Article in Journal
Multi-Objective Optimization for Selecting and Siting the Cost-Effective BMPs by Coupling Revised GWLF Model and NSGAII Algorithm
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Magnetophoretic Harvesting of Nannochloropsis oculata Using Iron Oxide Immobilized Beads

1
Graduate School of Engineering Science and Technology, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Yunlin 64002, Taiwan
2
Department of Safety, Health and Environment Engineering, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Yunlin 64002, Taiwan
3
School of Resources and Chemical Engineering, Sanming University, Sanming 365004, China
4
Bachelor Program in Interdisciplinary Studies, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Yunlin 64002, Taiwan
5
Center for Green Sustainable and Innovation, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Yunlin 64002, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2020, 12(1), 236; https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010236
Submission received: 27 November 2019 / Revised: 9 January 2020 / Accepted: 11 January 2020 / Published: 15 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Microalgal Harvesting)

Abstract

:
In this work, the harvesting of Nannochloropsis oculata microalgae through the use of nanosized Fe3O4 immobilized in polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)/sodium alginate (SA) as a flocculant (Fe3O4/PS) is investigated. Using the Fe3O4/PS immobilized beads could reduce the amount of soluble ferrous ions (Fe2+) released from naked Fe3O4 in acid treatment, leading to easy recovery. The characterization was performed under different dosages and pH values of Fe3O4/PS. The results show that the Fe3O4/PS, when applied to the algae culture (500 mg dry cell weight/L), achieves a 96% harvesting efficiency under conditions of a pH of 4 with 200 mT magnetic field intensity. Fe3O4/PS can be directly reused without adjusting the pH value. The recycled Fe3O4/PS shows stability in terms of its surface properties, maintaining more than 80% harvesting efficiency after five recycles. Magnetophoretic harvesting, using immobilized magnetic iron oxide as a particle-based flocculant, is a potential method to reduce challenges related to the cost-effective microalgae-harvesting method.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

As the flocculant plays a major role in the flocculation harvesting process, and as microalgae characteristics are small and stable when in a suspension with a negatively charged surface, the availability of low-cost flocculants and process scale-ups should be properly considered [1]. Low-cost options for harvesting microalgae by replacing chemical coagulants can solve both the problems of high costs and contamination associated with harvesting microalgae [2,3]. To date, several studies have successfully applied a flocculant to achieve a recyclable, low-toxicity, and low-cost harvesting process [4,5].
Nannochloropsis oculata has been widely developed, not only for the production of therapeutic agents in the pharmaceutical industry [6,7], but also for the production of nutrients [8], food [9], and biofuel. N. oculata is also regarded as attractive because it can be grown in brackish water and seawater.
Harvesting techniques for marine species of N. oculata are worth exploring, and have been developed due to marine species having a limited dependence of freshwater resources [8]. Recently, algae harvesting using charge neutralization and electrostatic bridging with functional nanoparticles, based on the magnetophoretic harvesting technique, has been intensively investigated [1]. The characteristics of magnetophoretic harvesting flocculating materials, such as iron oxide (Fe3O4) and iron yttrium oxide (Y3Fe5O12) are a high harvesting efficiency, ease of operation and recovery, low energy consumption, and magnetization and biocompatible properties [3,10,11,12]. In addition, the effective recycling of material could reduce the manufacturing costs of particle-based flocculants, which is important in terms of achieving a sustainable and low-cost process [13].
Magnetic nanomaterial iron oxides (Fe3O4) are widely used as a reusable adsorbent/flocculant for wastewater treatment [14,15]. Especially ferrous ions (Fe2+) of Fe3O4, which can be used as Fenton catalysts when under an acidic environment [16]. However, by using magnetic nanomaterials in the microalgae harvesting process, the Fe2+ ions have an impact on cytotoxicity for algae and cell growth inhibition [17,18].
The immobilization of iron oxide (Fe3O4) nanocomposites within polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and sodium alginate (SA) is a safe process that is widely used in other applications, such as wastewater treatment [19,20,21], pharmaceuticals, [22,23], and immobilized lipase for biodiesel production [24].
To our knowledge, the synthesis of PVA and SA-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles and the use of them as a magnetic flocculating material for harvesting marine microalga N. oculata has not been reported. Hence, this work aims to synthesize Fe3O4/PS particles through a mixed PVA and SA solution embedded with iron oxide (Fe3O4), with boric acid and phosphate as a spherical solution. Fe3O4/PS has a high mechanical performance and performs well regarding magnetic separation for algae harvesting. Batch experiments on Fe2+ ions released from an acidic environment, their dosage, different pH value conditions, and contact time were conducted, and the reusability of Fe3O4/PS was studied.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Algae Culture

The microalga used in this study was Nannochloropsis oculata, which was obtained from the Fisheries Research Institute Biotechnology Research Center (Tungkang, Taiwan). N. oculata was cultured in a 1 L photobioreactor with Walne’s medium for 10 days [25]. The cultivated temperature was maintained at 24 ± 0.7 °C under continuous illumination by a fluorescent lamp (26 W, EFHS26L-GE, China Electric, Hsinchu, Taiwan) with a light intensity of 67.5 µmol protons m−2 s−1. Cultures were aerated (EP-12000, Rambo, New Taipei City, Taiwan) at a rate of 0.25 vvm.
Biomass optical density was measured at a wavelength of 680 nm using a UV/VIS spectrophotometer (DR/4000U, Hach, Loveland, CO, USA). Dry biomass was washed with distilled water 3 times and then centrifuged (CN-820, Hsiangtai, New Taipei City, Taiwan) at 2500 rpm for 5 min, then dried in an oven (DO45, Dengyng, New Taipei City, Taiwan) at 105 °C for 24 h. The microalgae biomass concentration was estimated using Equation (1):
Biomass   concentration   mg / L = 494.59 × OD f 66.862 , R 2 = 0.995
where biomass is in milligrams per liter (mg/L) and ODf is the supernatant value.

2.2. Fe3O4/PS Preparation

Naked iron oxide Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles were immobilized in PVA and SA according to the method described by Huang et al. [20]. Briefly, 8 g of PVA and 2 g of SA were dissolved into 90 mL of diluted water and then autoclaved (TM-321, Tomin, New Taipei City, Taiwan) at 1.2 kg cm−2 (15 psi), at 121 °C, for 20 min. Then, the naked Fe3O4 (4.99 g) was mixed into the PVA/SA solution with a rotation speed of 150 rpm for 1 h until the mixture cooled down to room temperature. The mixture was added dropwise to the treatment mixture (containing 1% boric acid solution and 5% calcium chloride) with a peristaltic pump (RP-2000, Eyela, Tokyo, Japan). The formed beads were then transferred to a 5% KH2PO4 solution for 3 h to reinforce the mechanical strength. The resulting beads were quite uniform in size, with a diameter range of 2.4 ± 0.15 mm.

2.3. Characterization Analysis

The soluble iron Fe2+ concentration of Fe3O4/PS under different pH values was determined by using an inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES; OPTIMA 5100 DV, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) for 30 min. The morphology of Fe3O4/PS and naked Fe3O4 was determined by using a digital biological microscope (DMWB1-223, Motic, Xiaman, China) and a field emission scanning electron microscope (JSM-6710F, JEOL, Akishima, Japan). The zeta potential and particle size distribution of N. oculata and naked Fe3O4 were established using a zeta/nanoparticle analyzer (NanoPlus-3, Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA). All sample zeta potentials were measured 3 times to obtain average values.

2.4. Biomass Harvesting

The method of microalgae harvesting was according to that described by Zhu et al. [13]. The microalgae were cultivated for 10 days to achieve a biomass concentration of 0.5 ± 0.002 g/L as a dry weight. The algae solution was adjusted from pH 4 to pH 9 by using 0.1 M HCl and 0.1 M NaOH. The different dosages of naked Fe3O4 were 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, and 120 mg/L, respectively. The dosage of Fe3O4/PS was calculated as 0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, 2.0, and 2.4 g/L (per gram beads contained 50 mg naked Fe3O4), respectively. Both flocculants, as mixtures, were rotated using stirrers at 300 rpm for 1 min in the algae medium. Afterwards, a 10 × 10 × 1 cm external magnet (Magtech Magnetic Products Co., Taipei, Taiwan) with a 200 mT intensity was placed under the vials. Magnetic materials and biomass were passively harvested by the external magnetic field. Harvesting efficiency was determined by the optical density of the supernatant, which was collected from the water surface, and the harvesting efficiency of N. oculata was calculated according to Equation (2):
Harvesting   efficiency   % = OD i OD f OD i × 100
where ODi is the value of the initial culture and ODf is the value of the supernatant after harvesting.

2.5. Biomass Separation and Reusability

After Fe3O4/PS was harvested, the supernatant was carefully discarded with pipettes, and the Fe3O4/PS was transferred by an external magnet into 100 mL of diluted water and then washed 3 times without ultrasonic treatment. The naked Fe3O4 was mixed in the NaOH solution in vials, and the pH value was adjusted to 10. The mixture of algae and naked Fe3O4 was rotationally stirred at 500 rpm for 1 min, after which, the magnet was placed under the vials to collect the naked Fe3O4. The adsorbed algal biomass was separated from the detached naked Fe3O4. Afterwards, the supernatant of the algae was carefully discarded with the pipettes, then, 100 mL of distilled water was added into the detached naked Fe3O4 particles and treated with ultrasound at 40 kHz for 20 min.
In the reusability test, N. oculata was at an initial concentration of 500 mg/L and a pH of 5 for each cycle, and 120 mg/L and 2.4 g/L of Fe3O4 and Fe3O4/PS were applied, respectively. All separations of the detached measurements were considered as one recycle, with 5 reuse recycles performed in total.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The results are in 3 replicates and have been calculated as the mean with standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS V20 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA) analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s test at a probability level of p < 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Fe3O4/PS Characteristics

The soluble iron Fe2+ concentration of Fe3O4/PS and Fe3O4 under different pH values for 30 min is shown in Table 1. The concentration of dissolved ion Fe2+ of Fe3O4/PS was insignificant, since the pH value changed (p > 0.05). However, the soluble iron Fe2+ of Fe3O4 was increased when the pH value decreased (p < 0.05). Taylor and Owen [26] discussed that magnetite and hematite can be expressed in incongruent dissolution, which could yield various other less stable Fe oxides or oxyhydroxides in solution, as per Equation (3).
Fe 3 O 4 + 2 H + Fe 2 O 3 + Fe 2 + + H 2 O
It was reported that Fe2+ is beneficial to microbial attachment [27], but high concentrations of Fe2+ could decrease microbial attachment [28]. Ren et al. [29] reported that Fe3O4, as a magnetic material, can successfully develop granules with the addition of Fe2+ and Fe3O4, which could decrease negative charges on bacterial attachment. Wang et al. [12] also determined a slight iron dissolution of naked Fe3O4 at pH 3.01. This result indicated that PVA/SA immobilization could protect Fe3O4 and avoid oxidization from the high amount of dissolved oxygen in the algae medium. Moreover, removing soluble iron Fe2+ from the algae harvesting process could require additional processes.
Figure 1a–c shows the surface morphology of the prepared Fe3O4/PS. Fe3O4/PS was shown to exist in the form of spherical particles with a 2.4–2.9 mm particle size, found via a particle analyzer (n = 150; Figure 1a). Figure 1b shows the individual microsphere of Fe3O4/PS exhibiting paramagnetism (Figure 1c,d). Huang et al. [20] reported that the coercive force of the magnetization hysteresis loop of Fe3O4/PS was 5 emu/g, indicating that the Fe3O4/PS had a magnetic response and separation capability. Those results indicate that Fe3O4 immobilized by PVA and SA not only reduces the risk of water recycling with toxic materials but also facilitates magnet recovery.
In order to understand the impact of pH on the Nannochloropsis oculata interaction, the zeta potential can determine electrostatic repulsion for microalgal cells and material. Figure 2 shows the zeta potential measurement of N. oculata and naked Fe3O4 under different pH values. They were found to maintain a predominantly negative surface charge (−3 to −11 mV) over a wide pH range of 2 to 11 pH. This result was supported by Lama et al. [30], who estimated that the zeta potential of N. oculata SAG 38.85 cultivated in an artificial seawater medium was −7 mV. Boli et al. [31] also determined marine microalga Nannochloropsis oceanica CCMP1779 and magnetic microparticles under different pH values, finding different surface charges. Fe3O4 was positively charged under acidic conditions, with an isoelectric point between pH 6 and 7. This behavior is consistent with other studies in the literature [13]. Prochazkova et al. [32] also reported that the most pronounced difference between zeta potentials of interacting cells and iron oxide magnetic microparticles occurs at pH 4, resulting in the strongest electrostatic interactions and contributing to the highest efficiencies as compared to other pH values. Moreover, high pH values could result in decreased harvesting efficiency [30].

3.2. Effects of Dosage Concentration on Magnetic Harvesting

The performance of Nannochloropsis oculata harvesting efficiency, using different dosages of Fe3O4/PS and naked Fe3O4, is shown in Figure 3. Harvesting efficiency reached 99 ± 0.7% and 92 ± 0.6% at the optimal dosage of naked Fe3O4 120 mg/L at pH 4 and 5, respectively. It reached 96 ± 0.3% and 90 ± 0.5% at the same dosage after PVA and SA modification at pH 4 and 5, respectively. Specifically, at any Fe3O4/PS dosage, there were insignificant differences (p > 0.05) in harvesting efficiency between the pH values, suggesting a great influence from the acidic environment. A similar effect has been reported in other studies; Wang et al. [12] used polyphenol-coated Fe3O4 particles and also successfully flocculated oleaginous microalgae, reaching 93% efficiency at an optimal dosage of 25 g/L.
Dosage increments from 40 to 120 g/L of naked Fe3O4 reached > 80% harvesting efficiency for N. oculata. This is because the Fe2+ ions from the Fe3O4 detected in this study gradually increased with a decreasing pH value (Table 1). This could be ascribed to Fe2+ ions being able to potentially oxidize into Fe3+ ions in an acidic environment, thereby acting as flocculants [32]. The harvesting efficiency of Fe3O4/PS when using a dosage of 80 mg/L showed that it required nearly 2-fold the dose to obtain a comparable level of harvesting efficiency where immobilization was absent.
Earlier studies revealed that, when using PVA for surface immobilization, PVA adsorption increases with polymer molecular weight, which could provide sufficient functional groups and positive active sites for adsorption [33]. Although PVA and SA are promising potential alternative coagulants, they do not achieve efficient microalgal harvesting when directly used in flocculation (Figure 2). The improved activity of Fe3O4/PS had a positive effect on harvesting N. oculata. The coating of a polymer was sufficient to cover Fe3O4 surfaces and ensure the colloidal stability of Fe3O4/PS over a wide range of pH levels without oxidation [12]. These findings reveal the stability of Fe3O4/PS to repeated harvesting, supporting its application in marine microalgae harvesting.

3.3. Effects of pH on Magnetic Harvesting

Figure 4 shows the Nannochloropsis oculata harvesting efficiency of Fe3O4/PS under different pH values. The effectiveness of Fe3O4/PS was tested at several pH values, from pH 4 to 9, using a dosage of 120 mg/L (2.4 g w/w). The highest efficiency was obtained at an acidic pH of 4, with 91 ± 4.2% within the first 120 min, and reached a maximum of 96 ± 0.3% at a sedimentation time of 180 min. Under acidic conditions, a clear supernatant was observed, while poor efficiency was obtained in alkaline conditions. This finding was supported by Fuad et al. [34] who achieved the greatest flocculation efficiency at an acidic pH value using a tannin-based natural biopolymer (AFlok-BP1) to harvest marine Nannochloropsis sp. throughout 2 h of sedimentation.
Fe3O4/PS occurred at pH 8 and 9, but it was less effective, which affected sample efficiency. The alkaline environment was established by adding NaOH in this study. A previous study reported that using polydiallyldimethylammonium chloride (PDADMAC) for marine microalga Nannochloropsis salina at an alkaline pH of 10 resulted in a decrease of efficiency, since a high dosage was required because of the adsorption of salt anions on the polymer or algae [35].
Wiśniewska et al. [33] demonstrated that the main reason for polyvinyl alcohol adsorption reduction at pH 9 was because a high pH value causes a significant increase in same charge mutual repulsion, which means that PVA can only undergo adsorption through the formation of hydrogen bonds by hydroxyl groups occurring in a high pH solution.
Despite the benefits of alkaline pH, such as low toxicity and the potential of reusing the culture medium, the alkaline environment still affects lipid extraction and the fatty acids profile (Fraud et al., 2018). Changing the conditions of the adsorption process impacts the macromolecular compound-binding mechanism. Additionally, the stability mechanism was precisely determined due to the application of the immobilization method. A higher molecular weight is likely to be nonselective, significantly contributing to the adhesion between microalgae. It can be successful for industrial microalgae strains [32], but also in the case of removing harmful microalgae [5,36].

3.4. Fe3O4/PS Reusability

Figure 5 shows the reusability of Fe3O4/PS. The harvesting efficiency of Nannochloropsis oculata was established under conditions of a pH of 5. The separation process of Fe3O4/PS from the solution was conducted with an external magnet after reaction for 180 min. Afterwards, Fe3O4/PS was washed three times with diluted water and then reused. The method of Fe3O4/PS detachment between algae cells and magnetic particles was carried out without adjusting the pH condition. A harvesting efficiency of 96% was achieved with the original Fe3O4/PS, which was reduced to 80% after five recycles. Fe3O4 immobilization within PVA and SA has advantages such as easy separation and no limits in aerobic conditions. Wang et al. [12] indicated that the zeta potential of the natural polymer Fe3O4 (Fe3O4–PP) insignificantly changed after recycling the microalgae harvested five times. This result is supportive of the advantageous properties of an immobilization technique for application in microalgae harvesting.
In addition, flocculants cannot hinder downstream bioprocesses, and metallic nanoparticles can negatively impact usability. Zhu et al. [3] suggested that pH adjustment for the separation of naked Fe3O4 has a negative impact, due to the decreased efficiency of microalgal biomass. However, the algae organic matter released by algal cells contain amounts of carbohydrates, nitrogen source compounds, and various organic acids [37,38], which are actively excreted during microalgae growth. Therefore, the effect of a decrease of the efficiency of the harvesting process by organic algae matter on flocculant surface structure should be investigated in future studies [12].
Overall, Fe3O4/PS can reduce the risk of environmental damage associated with the application of nanomaterials.

4. Conclusions

Nano Fe3O4, immobilized in polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)/sodium alginate (SA), was successfully applied as a flocculant for magnetophoretic harvesting in this study. The Fe3O4/PS, with a larger size than naked Fe3O4, can be easily recovered from the microalgae harvesting process without the need to adjust the pH for separation. The concentration of soluble ion Fe2+ indicated that naked Fe3O4 is unstable at an acidic pH value, and that microalgae harvesting with Fe3O4/PS could be a suitable method to overcome soluble ion Fe2+ release. The reusability of Fe3O4/PS was successfully achieved by recycling during 5 cycles. To make it more attractive and understand the relationship between harvesting efficiency and high concentrations of microalgal cells, an analysis of the outdoor scale performance and harvesting efficiency when using Fe3O4/PS will be conducted in a future study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.-J.C. and T.-J.W.; Data curation, F.-J.C., H.C. and P.-M.K.; Formal analysis, F.-J.C.; Project administration, T.-J.W. and C.-H.W.; Software, C.-H.W.; Visualization, F.-J.C.; Writing—review and editing, T.-J.W. and C.-H.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, grant number MOST 108-2218-E-224-001, and the Natural Science Foundation of the Higher Education Institutions of Fujian Province of China, grant number 2018J01516. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Andreas Kirkinis from the MDPI English editing service for correcting this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Matter, I.A.; Bui, V.K.H.; Jung, M.; Seo, J.Y.; Kim, Y.-E.; Lee, Y.C.; Oh, Y.K. Flocculation harvesting techniques for microalgae: A review. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 3069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Singh, G.; Patidar, S.K. Microalgae harvesting techniques: A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 217, 499–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhu, L.; Nugroho, Y.K.; Shakeel, S.R.; Li, Z.; Martinkauppi, B.; Hiltunen, E. Using microalgae to produce liquid transportation biodiesel: What is next? Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 78, 391–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chua, E.T.; Eltanahy, E.; Jung, H.; Uy, M.; Thomas-Hall, S.R.; Schenk, P.M. Efficient harvesting of Nannochloropsis microalgae via optimized chitosan-mediated flocculation. Glob. Chall. 2019, 3, 1800038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Yan, C.; Song, X.; Yu, M.; Tong, Y.; Zhang, W. Determining the effects of polyaluminum chloride alkalinities and dosage treatments on various microalgal growth phases for the treatment of microalgae-laden water. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 209, 202–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Surendhiran, D.; Vijay, M. Effect of various pretreatment for extracting intracellular lipid from Nannochloropsis oculata under nitrogen replete and depleted conditions. ISRN Chem. Eng. 2014, 2014, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Sansone, C.; Brunet, C. Promises and challenges of microalgal antioxidant production. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Fuad, N.; Omar, R.; Kamarudin, S.; Harun, R.; Idris, A.; Wan, W.A. Mass harvesting of marine microalgae using different techniques. Food Bioprod. Process. 2018, 112, 169–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Han, P.; Lu, Q.; Fan, L.; Zhou, W. A review on the use of microalgae for sustainable aquaculture. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Toh, P.Y.; Yeap, S.P.; Kong, L.P.; Ng, B.W.; Chan, D.J.C.; Ahmad, A.L.; Lim, J.K. Magnetophoretic removal of microalgae from fishpond water: Feasibility of high gradient and low gradient magnetic separation. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 211–212, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, T.; Yang, W.L.; Hong, Y.; Hou, Y.L. Magnetic nanoparticles grafted with amino-riched dendrimer as magnetic flocculant for efficient harvesting of oleaginous microalgae. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 297, 304–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Jiang, X.; Liu, L.; Li, X.; Li, H.; Liang, W. In-situ self-assembly of plant polyphenol-coated Fe3O4 particles for oleaginous microalgae harvesting. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 214, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhu, L.D.; Hiltunen, E.; Li, Z. Using magnetic materials to harvest microalgal biomass: Evaluation of harvesting and detachment efficiency. Environ. Technol. 2019, 40, 1006–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gao, F. An overview of surface-functionalized magnetic nanoparticles: Preparation and application for wastewater treatment. ChemistrySelect 2019, 4, 6805–6811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gallo-Cordova, A.; Morales, M.P.; Mazarío, E. Effect of the surface charge on the adsorption capacity of chromium (VI) of iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles prepared by microwave-assisted synthesis. Water 2019, 11, 2372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Schwaminger, S.P.; Bauer, D.; Fraga-García, P.; Wagner, F.E.; Berensmeier, S. Oxidation of magnetite nanoparticles: Impact on surface and crystal properties. CrystEngComm 2017, 19, 246–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Aruoja, V.; Pokhrel, S.; Sihtmäe, M.; Mortimer, M.; Mädler, L.; Kahru, A. Toxicity of 12 metal-based nanoparticles to algae, bacteria and protozoa. Environ. Sci. Nano 2015, 2, 630–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vashist, V.; Chauhan, D.; Bhattacharya, A.; Rai, M.P. Role of silica coated magnetic nanoparticle on cell flocculation, lipid extraction and linoleic acid production from Chlorella pyrenoidosa. Nat. Prod. Res. 2019, 11, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lv, X.; Jiang, G.; Xue, X.; Wu, D.; Sheng, T.; Sun, C.; Xu, X. Fe0-Fe3O4 nanocomposites embedded polyvinyl alcohol/sodium alginate beads for chromium (VI) removal. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 262, 748–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Huang, C.F.; Huang, A.C.; Hsieh, Y.F.; Chu, F.J.; Wan, T.J. The effects of magnetic nanoparticles embedded with SA/PVA and pH on chemical-mechanical polishing wastewater and magnetic particle regeneration and recycle. Water Resour. Ind. 2017, 18, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, S.; Hu, J.; Shi, J.; Wang, M.; Guo, Y.; Li, M.; Duo, J.; Deng, T. Composite hydrogel particles encapsulated ammonium molybdophosphate for efficiently cesium selective removal and enrichment from wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 371, 694–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Mahdavinia, G.R.; Etemadi, H. In situ synthesis of magnetic CaraPVA IPN nanocomposite hydrogels and controlled drug release. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2014, 45, 250–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Prabha, G.; Raj, V. Sodium alginate-polyvinyl alcohol-bovin serum albumin coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles as anticancer drug delivery vehicle: Doxorubicin loading and in vitro release study and cytotoxicity to HepG2 and L02 cells. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. Mater. Biol. Appl. 2017, 79, 410–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Matinja, A.I.; Mohd Zain, N.A.; Suhaimi, M.S.; Alhassan, A.J. Optimization of biodiesel production from palm oil mill effluent using lipase immobilized in PVA-alginate-sulfate beads. Renew. Energy. 2019, 135, 1178–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chu, F.J.; Wan, T.J.; Pai, T.Y.; Lin, H.W.; Liu, S.H.; Huang, C.F. Use of magnetic fields and nitrate concentration to optimize the growth and lipid yield of Nannochloropsis oculata. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 253, 109680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Taylor, P.; Owen, D.G. Oxidation of Magnetite in Aerated Aqueous Media; Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd.: Pinawa, MB, Canada, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  27. Yilmaz, G.; Bozkurt, U.; Magden, K.A. Effect of iron ions (Fe2+, Fe3+) on the formation and structure of aerobic granular sludge. Biodegradation 2017, 28, 53–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hao, W.; Li, Y.; Lv, J.; Chen, L.; Zhu, J. The biological effect of metal ions on the granulation of aerobic granular activated sludge. J. Environ. Sci. 2016, 44, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ren, X.; Chen, Y.; Guo, L.; She, Z.; Gao, M.; Zhao, Y.; Shao, M. The influence of Fe2+, Fe3+ and magnet powder (Fe3O4) on aerobic granulation and their mechanisms. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 164, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lama, S.; Muylaert, K.; Karki, T.B.; Foubert, I.; Henderson, R.K.; Vandamme, D. Flocculation properties of several microalgae and a cyanobacterium species during ferric chloride, chitosan and alkaline flocculation. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 220, 464–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Boli, E.; Savvidou, M.; Logothetis, D.; Louli, V.; Pappa, G.; Voutsas, E.; Kolisis, F.; Magoulas, K. Magnetic harvesting of marine algae Nannochloropsis oceanica. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2017, 2017, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Prochazkova, G.; Safarik, I.; Branyik, T. Harvesting microalgae with microwave synthesized magnetic microparticles. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 130, 472–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wiśniewska, M.; Ostolska, I.; Szewczuk-Karpisz, K.; Chibowski, S.; Terpilowski, K.; Gun’ko, V.M.; Zarko, V.I. Investigation of the polyvinyl alcohol stabilization mechanism and adsorption properties on the surface of ternary mixed nanooxide AST 50 (Al2O3-SiO2-TiO2). J. Nanopart. Res. 2015, 17, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Fuad, N.; Omar, R.; Kamarudin, S.; Harun, R.; Idris, A.; Wan Azlina, W.A.K.G. Effective use of tannin based natural biopolymer, AFlok-BP1 to harvest marine microalgae Nannochloropsis. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 4318–4328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gerchman, Y.; Vasker, B.; Tavasi, M.; Mishael, Y.; Kinel-Tahan, Y.; Yehoshua, Y. Effective harvesting of microalgae: Comparison of different polymeric flocculants. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 228, 141–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Abo Markeb, A.; Llimos-Turet, J.; Ferrer, I.; Blanquez, P.; Alonso, A.; Sanchez, A.; Moral-Vico, J.; Font, X. The use of magnetic iron oxide based nanoparticles to improve microalgae harvesting in real wastewater. Water. Res. 2019, 159, 490–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kavitha, S.; Yukesh Kannah, R.; Rajesh Banu, J.; Kaliappan, S.; Johnson, M. Biological disintegration of microalgae for biomethane recovery-prediction of biodegradability and computation of energy balance. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 244, 1367–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kavitha, S.; Subbulakshmi, P.; Rajesh Banu, J.; Gobi, M.; Tae Yeom, I. Enhancement of biogas production from microalgal biomass through cellulolytic bacterial pretreatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 233, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Surface morphology of prepared polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and sodium alginate (SA)-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles (Fe3O4/PS). (a) Size distribution (%) of Fe3O4/PS; (b) Iron oxide immobilized in Fe3O4/PS determined by field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM). (c) Magnetic separation of naked Fe3O4 and (d) Fe3O4/PS attracted in water under a 200 mT magnet.
Figure 1. Surface morphology of prepared polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and sodium alginate (SA)-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles (Fe3O4/PS). (a) Size distribution (%) of Fe3O4/PS; (b) Iron oxide immobilized in Fe3O4/PS determined by field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM). (c) Magnetic separation of naked Fe3O4 and (d) Fe3O4/PS attracted in water under a 200 mT magnet.
Water 12 00236 g001
Figure 2. Zeta potentials of naked Fe3O4 and Nannochloropsis oculata as a function of pH.
Figure 2. Zeta potentials of naked Fe3O4 and Nannochloropsis oculata as a function of pH.
Water 12 00236 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of different dosages of Fe3O4/PS and naked Fe3O4 on Nannochloropsis oculata harvesting efficiency with an initial concentration of 500 mg/L.
Figure 3. Comparison of different dosages of Fe3O4/PS and naked Fe3O4 on Nannochloropsis oculata harvesting efficiency with an initial concentration of 500 mg/L.
Water 12 00236 g003
Figure 4. Nannochloropsis oculata harvesting efficiency (with initial concentration of 500 mg/L) at different Fe3O4/PS pH values. Results are in the form of average ± standard deviation.
Figure 4. Nannochloropsis oculata harvesting efficiency (with initial concentration of 500 mg/L) at different Fe3O4/PS pH values. Results are in the form of average ± standard deviation.
Water 12 00236 g004
Figure 5. Nannochloropsis oculata harvesting efficiency (with an initial concentration of 500 mg/L) at different Fe3O4/PS recycles. Results are in the form of average ± standard deviation.
Figure 5. Nannochloropsis oculata harvesting efficiency (with an initial concentration of 500 mg/L) at different Fe3O4/PS recycles. Results are in the form of average ± standard deviation.
Water 12 00236 g005
Table 1. Concentration of soluble iron Fe2+ of Fe3O4/PS and naked Fe3O4 under different pH values.
Table 1. Concentration of soluble iron Fe2+ of Fe3O4/PS and naked Fe3O4 under different pH values.
ConditionConcentration of Soluble Iron Fe2+ (mg/L)
pH 3pH 4pH 5pH 6
Fe3O4/PS 116 ± 0.02 a15.9 ± 0.03 a15.9 ± 0.03 a15.9 ± 0.02 a
Naked Fe3O4 22220 ± 31 d1077 ± 67 c132 ± 8 b22 ± 3 a
1 The concentration of Fe3O4/PS calculates at 2.4 g/L (w/w). 2 The concentration of Fe3O4 was 120 mg/L. Means ± standard deviations. Different lowercase letters (a, b, c, and d) in the same line correspond to significant differences between all assays (p < 0.05) as found by Tukey’s test.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chu, F.-J.; Wan, T.-J.; Chen, H.; Wu, C.-H.; Kao, P.-M. Magnetophoretic Harvesting of Nannochloropsis oculata Using Iron Oxide Immobilized Beads. Water 2020, 12, 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010236

AMA Style

Chu F-J, Wan T-J, Chen H, Wu C-H, Kao P-M. Magnetophoretic Harvesting of Nannochloropsis oculata Using Iron Oxide Immobilized Beads. Water. 2020; 12(1):236. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010236

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chu, Feng-Jen, Terng-Jou Wan, His Chen, Chih-Hung Wu, and Po-Min Kao. 2020. "Magnetophoretic Harvesting of Nannochloropsis oculata Using Iron Oxide Immobilized Beads" Water 12, no. 1: 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010236

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop