Next Article in Journal
An Optimal Allocation Model for Large Complex Water Resources System Considering Water supply and Ecological Needs
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Different Radiation Sources and Noble Metal Doped onto TiO2 for Contaminants of Emerging Concern Removal
Previous Article in Journal
Identifying Optimal Irrigation Water Needs at District Scale by Using a Physically Based Agro-Hydrological Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of Advanced Oxidation Products on Nanofiltration Efficiency
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Study of the Performance of Dielectric Barrier Discharge under Different Conditions for Nitrobenzene Degradation

1
School of the Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
2
College of Environment, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
3
Institute of Environmental Engineering and Research, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore 54890, Pakistan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2019, 11(4), 842; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11040842
Submission received: 29 March 2019 / Revised: 15 April 2019 / Accepted: 17 April 2019 / Published: 22 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Oxidation Technologies in Industrial Wastewater Treatment)

Abstract

:
Water scarcity and water contamination due to the extensive use of organic compounds in industries trigger us to adopt modern techniques for wastewater treatment. In this research, we developed a new dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) system which was evaluated for the degradation of nitrobenzene in water under different experimental arrangements. DBD produces an enormous amount of active species like O3, O, O2+ and O2 and OH to degrade the pollutants. In this study, NB (Nitrobenzene) was treated from wastewater by changing the gas flow rate, adopting different carrier gas, by adding inhibitors and promoters and the effect of applied voltage on the production of active species to check the effectiveness of the DBD system. The DBD system was evaluated based on input power, degradation efficiency and energy yield compared with other advanced oxidation processes. The energy yield of the DBD system was 1.253 mg/kWh for the degradation of 20 mg/L of NB to 75% in 60 min with the discharge power of 0.538 W, which displays better results in comparison with the other AOPs regarding energy yield and the degradation efficiency of the pollutant. The results illustrate the significance of the system and further suggest its application to industrial-scale treatment.

1. Introduction

Water scarcity and water pollution are major issues in the world at present. Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) are compounds that have alarming concerns because of their toxicity, bioaccumulation and perseverance among the ecosystems. Many compounds have high threats to human and ecological health at small concentrations [1]. Nitro-aromatic compounds are extensively being used as solvents and intermediates for the production of explosives, pesticides, plastics and many other chemical products. Nitrobenzene (NB, Figure 1) is one of the nitro-aromatic compounds that has been used to produce aniline, dyes, explosives and various pharmaceutical products [2]. It is used as an organic solvent in water and soil because of its dispersive nature. It has a significant environmental concern because of its toxicity, the quantity of production and difficult biodegradation [3,4,5].
The nitro-group in NB has a robust electron-withdrawing property that hinders the traditional chemical oxidation and the biological treatment methods [6]. In this perspective, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) exhibit advantages over conventional treatment methods because of the generation of strong oxidants. These oxidants have the capability to eliminate the problems associated with bio-resistant organic compounds [7]. DBD is one of the AOPs that has received enormous attention for the removal of organic pollutants in recent years [8,9]. It is broadly used in the study for surface treatment [10,11], volatile organic compound (VOC) degradation [12,13], catalyst treatment [14] and in several other areas. The use of DBD technology for wastewater degradation [15,16,17] is a novel approach towards wastewater treatment. DBD plasma systems produce active species such as O3, OH, oxygen atom radicals and H2O2 that allow the organic pollutants to decompose [16,18,19,20,21,22,23]. These active species act as powerful oxidizing agents that can prompt chain reactions in pollutant molecules and are expected to degrade wastewater pollutants. Due to their high oxidizing strength, many complex and toxic organic pollutants could be converted to less or even non-toxic products and degraded fully into CO2 and H2O, thus giving an eventual solution for wastewater treatment [24]. As compared to other treatment methods, DBD produces a stable, uniform and diffuse discharge. Furthermore, DBD has a small footprint in the environment, a high treatment efficiency, a short processing cycle and no effects of secondary pollution [23].
We focused to evaluate the DBD plasma reactor for the removal of NB applying different experimental conditions such as the effects of changing the gas flow rate, the frequency of the input gas, the effects of different inhibitor and promoter and effects of adding methanol. The novel approach was adopted to get efficient results at lower discharge power inputs. The DBD system was evaluated based on the degradation efficiencies and by comparing the reaction kinetics and energy yield with other published works to know the effectiveness of this system.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Setup

The experimental system comprises of a DBD reactor, an oxygen source equipped with a pressure gauge, a 45 L water barrel containing the NB polluted water, a pump to regulate the water flow in the system, high voltage power supply with an oscilloscope, mixing reaction tank and a gas-liquid separator. DBD configuration and experimental design are illustrated in Figure 2. The water container was filled with tap water followed by the mixing of specific amounts of NB and other chemicals to yield synthetic wastewater. Before initiating the DBD reactor, the solution was pumped with a flow rate of 1.0 m3/h for 3 min to mix it thoroughly and regulate the flow in the system. Oxygen was then supplied to the DBD reactor, and the concentration was set to 3 L/min. A pressure of 0.1 MPa was maintained and monitored throughout the experiment. High voltage power (1–1.8 kV) was applied to the DBD reactor which ionized the oxygen molecules to produce a huge number of highly active species. An ammeter and an oscilloscope (WaveJet 354A, LeCory, Mansfield, TX, USA) were used to monitor the power parameters. The run time duration of the system was 60 min. Samples were taken after specific intervals (such as 0, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 min) to monitor the degradation rate of nitrobenzene. All the conditions for the operation of the DBD reactor are reported in Table 1.
The DBD’s configurations and principles depend on the presence of a dielectric barrier in the discharge path which is based on quartz, alumina, glass, plastics, ceramics, mica, Teflon, rubber or silica. To generate plasma at a normal pressure and high voltage amplitudes, the discharge gap is normally kept between 0.1 mm to 10 mm [25].
The internal assembly of the DBD reactor consists of two sintered sliver electors attached to dielectric plates of ceramics. The ceramic plates are separated by insulating tapes to maintain a plate clearance of about 0.2 mm, as shown in the DBD reactor’s assembly (Figure 2). The main base of the DBD reactor consists of sintered silver metal painted with a thin layer of α-Al2O3 on its external surface. This base contains an array of outward-extended plates that work as a heat sink providing a large surface area to the system to absorb heat. When oxygen is provided, high voltage power is applied to the DBD reactor, O2 molecules get excited and produce a strong discharge in the displacement between the two dielectric layers. As a result, both the physical and chemical reactions occur simultaneously, producing a huge quantity of active species with a high activity [22,23,26]. Hydroxyl radicals (OH) are produced, when the active species like O3, O, O2+ and O2 enter the water. These active species and hydroxyl radicals react with the pollutants and degrade them into stable or less active by-products. The detailed mechanism of the production of active species in the DBD reactor and their percolation into water is described in the following chemical reactions.
O2 + e → 2O + e
O2 + O ↔ O3
O + H2O → 2 OH
O + H2O → OH + OH
O3 + OHHO2 + O2
O3 + OH → HO2 + O2
O3 + HO2OH + 2O2

2.2. Materials Used

We used the following analytical grade reagents in the experiments containing nitrobenzene C6H5NO2 (99.0%), hydrogen peroxide H2O2 (30%), ferrous sulphate heptahydrate FeSO4·7H2O, anhydrous sodium carbonate Na2CO3 (99.8%), sodium hydrogen carbonate NaHCO3 (99.5%), isopropyl alcohol C3H8O (IPA) (99.7%) and tert-Butanol C4H10O (TBA) (98%). All these reagents were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd, Shanghai. Distilled water was used to prepare the stock solutions for all the experiments.

2.3. Analysis Methods

The concentration of NB was determined by using the equation obtained by the calibration curve of nitrobenzene solutions with the help of UV-vis spectrophotometer (UV-9600 Rayleigh, Beijing, China) throughout the experiments [27,28]. The absorbance of several known concentration samples of NB was determined at 262 nm wavelength. Calibration curve between absorbance (at 262 nm) and the concentration was plotted as shown in Figure 3. Total organic carbon (TOC) was measured by a TOC analyzer (TOC-L/CPN, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). Ozone concentration in the air stream as produced by the DBD reactor was determined by Ozone Monitor (KEN-2000, Evergreen, Carnate, Italy) and the ozone concentration in the water was determined by a D. Ozone Microprocessor Controller (CL7685, B & C electronics, Carnate, Italy). The NB degradation efficiency was calculated by the following equation
η = C t C 0 C 0 × 100
where η is the degradation and removal efficiency of NB, Ct is the NB concentration at interval time t and C0 is the NB initial concentration.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. The Effect of Applied Voltage on the Production of Active Species

Discharge voltage is the main electrical parameter to judge the performance of the DBD reactor because it has a vital role in the production of plasma (such as O3 and OH) [29]. Researchers have mentioned that at higher voltages, the power of the DBD system is higher to produce ozone [30,31]. Eventually, it would increase the degradation efficiency of the pollutants due to the production of a huge number of active species. Therefore, the effect of voltage on the production of ozone was investigated in this study and the results are shown in Figure 4a. Four levels of voltages 1.2, 1.4, 1.6 and 1.8 kV were investigated at the oxygen flow rate of 3 L/min. Ozone concentrations were measured for 30 min and an average value was opted to analyze the results. It was found that the ozone production increased with the increase in voltage.

3.2. Effect of Varying Oxygen Flow on the Concentration of O3 in Water and Air Stream

The ozone produced by the DBD reactor was introduced to the system containing polluted water. Further, it was mixed with the polluted water to react with the pollutants present in it and degrade them eventually. Ozone produced by the DBD reactor was introduced to the system to further produce hydroxyl radicals and to enhance the degradation of the pollutants. The more the ozone produced, the greater would be the treatment efficiency of the system. In view of this concept, the ozone concentration in the air stream produced directly by the DBD reactor and its concentration after mixing it in water were investigated and the results are presented in Figure 4b.

3.3. The Effect of Different Carrier Gases on NB Degradation

Different carrier gasses produce different active species and in varying amounts. The production of ozone and the hydroxyl radical is associated with the specific carrier gas and ultimately results in the higher or lower degradation efficiencies of the available pollutant depending on these carrier gases. N2 is an inert gas that does not participate in most of the reactions and the bond dissociation energy of O2 (5.12 eV) is less than that of N2 (9.82 eV). Therefore, O2 is easily dissociated as compared to N2, producing more active species. To investigate the effect of different carrier gases, O2, N2 and air were provided to the DBD reactor at the same flow rate and same experimental conditions. The results showed that the degradation efficiency of NB is much higher when O2 was the carrier gas as compared to the air and N2 as shown in Figure 5. Moreover, the active species produced by oxygen are O3 and OH, which are more reactive as compared to the species produced by N2, that is, N, N2+ and N+ [29].

3.4. The Influence of Oxygen Flow Rate on NB Degradation

The effect of oxygen flow was investigated on the O3 production. NB degradation at different oxygen flow rates such as 3, 4 and 5 L/min was adopted. Other conditions were 20 mg/L of NB, voltage and water flow rate was considered similar to the previous reactor setup, i.e., 1.8 kV and 1 m3/h, respectively. The results illustrated a remarkable difference while providing a higher flow rate of oxygen, increasing the degradation efficiency, as shown in Figure 6. Since, at higher flow rates more oxygen flows into the system, resulting in a lot of active species being generated. Therefore, active species help the degradation process to incline. A study by Reddy et al. (2013) constructed similar arguments [7].

3.5. The Effect of Different Inhibitors on NB Degradation

In order to know the role of hydroxyl radicals in the DBD plasma treatment and the degradation of NB, the effects of different inhibitors were investigated here. Tertiary butyl alcohol (TBA) and Isopropyl alcohol (IPA) are known to have the best scavenging effect for hydroxyl radicals [32]. Despite these two scavengers, carbonate and bicarbonate ions were also used to check the scavenging effect of hydroxyl radicals for the treatment of NB. The results of NB degradation with scavengers and without scavengers were compared. The results shown in Figure 7 reports that the degradation of NB was significantly decreased by the addition of these scavengers. However, increasing the concentration of these inhibitors decreased the efficiency of the NB removal, which demonstrates the hydroxyl radicals are scavenged. We confirmed the role of hydroxyl radicals for NB degradation. Carbonate and bicarbonate anions were shown to have a smaller scavenging effect compared to TBA and IPA. Similar results were investigated by many other researchers [32,33,34].

3.6. Effect of Promoters

H2O2 and Fe2+ were used as the promoters to check the degradation efficiency of NB. The DBD reactor produces a large quantity of active species and the most important active species in this study are the hydroxyl radical and H2O2. Different concentrations of 50, 100 and 200 mg/L of hydrogen peroxide were added to the system in different batches. In the first batch, hydrogen peroxide was added in a single lump at the start of the experiment while in the second batch, the hydrogen peroxide was used intermittently by adding 20 mg/L after every 10 min. The results showed that the addition of hydrogen peroxide with definite intervals gave better results compared to the addition at once, as shown in Figure 8. This can be explained because the oxidation potential of the hydroxyl radical (E = 2.02 V) is higher than that of hydrogen peroxide (E = 1.78 V) [32], the species with a higher oxidation potential has a greater strength to degrade the pollutant molecules. Therefore, the addition of hydrogen peroxide at once increased its concentration compared to hydroxyl radicals in the system which resulted in a declining trend of degradation efficiency. On the other hand, if hydrogen peroxide was added with intervals and with smaller amounts, it showed significant results. This is because, at higher concentrations, hydrogen peroxide exhibits a self-scavenging effect. Similarly, hydroxyl radicals were scavenged by excess H2O2 resulting in the HO2 and H2O production as described in Equation (9). Figure 8 shows the results for both promoters and it was obvious that the degradation of NB was accelerated and inhibited with the addition of H2O2 depending on the mode of dosage. Similar results were described by Jiao et al. [35] for the degradation of nitrobenzene and by Feng et al. for the degradation of diuron [36]. Ferrous ions Fe2+ were added to the solution to check the effect of NB degradation in the DBD system which further reacted with hydrogen peroxide to produce hydroxyl radicals as described in Equation (10) [7]. The addition of Fe2+ ions produced hydroxyl radicals that eventually increased the degradation of the pollutants as shown in Figure 8.
H2O2 + OH → H2O + HO2
H2O2 + Fe2+ → Fe3+ + OH + OH

3.7. Effect of Addition of Methanol on the Degradation of NB

Methanol acts as a hydroxyl radicle scavenger. We added methanol to check its effect on the degradation efficiency of NB. Figure 9 shows the degradation of NB with and without the addition of methanol. The degradation of nitrobenzene is greatly influenced by the addition of methanol. By adding 10 mL of methanol in the system, the degradation decreases from 75% to 21% compared to the system without methanol (NB only in Figure 9). Increasing the methanol concentration showed a significant decrease in the NB degradation efficiency. These results indicate that the free radicles were the main active species for degradation. Duan et al. (2016) [37] also reported that these free radicals are scavenged by the addition of methanol. We are in good agreement that by adding methanol to the solution, free radicals will be scavenged, hence, reducing the NB degradation efficiency.

3.8. TOC Removal and NB Degradation Results

Karuppiah et al. (2019) reported the total organic carbon (TOC) removal along with the pollutant degradation to evaluate the process efficiency [38]. In our study, we have picked TOC as a parameter to check its removal efficiency as compared with the NB degradation efficiency. Figure 10 displays the TOC removal efficiency and NB degradation efficiency of the DBD system. The results indicate a remarkable NB degradation efficiency while the TOC removal was not significant. The similar results for TOC removal were expressed by Shen et al. (2006) [39].

3.9. Degradation Kinetics

Yin et al. (2012) [40] studied the first order kinetics model to evaluate the NB degradation process. We adopted a similar approach to study the first order kinetic model as given in Equation (11). The basic aim to study reaction kinetics was to investigate the reaction process of NB degradation.
ln ( C t C 0 ) = kt
where Ct is the NB concentration at a given time t (min) and C0 is the initial NB concentration and k is the reaction rate constant. The kinetic constant k for the degradation of NB in the DBD reactor was reported to be 0.0237 min−1 with an R2 of 0.9983 which was compared with the other AOPs in Table 2.

3.10. Energy Yield

Energy yield is an important parameter to study the degradation efficiency of nitrobenzene (NB). By measuring the energy yield we mean the NB degradation efficiency per unit of energy used by the DBD reactor. Energy yield (Y in mg/kWh) for the degradation of NB was calculated by the following formula [7,45]
Y = C 0 × V × D P × t × 100
where C0 is the NB initial concentration in mg/L, V is the total volume (in L), D is the degradation efficiency (%), P is the discharge power of the DBD reactor in kW and t is time (in h). Discharge power (P) used by the DBD reactor was calculated by the charge (Q) and voltage (V) Lissajous method [7,46,47]. Where charge Q (i.e., time-integrated current) was measured from the capacitor voltage across the 4.7 µF capacitor connected in series with the ground electrode of DBD. Voltage was measured by connecting a high voltage probe (P6015A, Tektronix, Beaverton, OR, USA) and the V and Q waveform was plotted by connecting a Digital Oscilloscope (WaveJet 354A, Mansfield, TX, USA) across the high voltage supply to get the V-Q Lissajous curve as shown in Figure 11. The area of the V-Q Lissajous curve represents the energy (E) dissipated in the system and the discharge power was obtained by multiplying the area of this curve with the frequency, i.e., P = f × E [48]. A comprehensive comparison of power, energy yields and degradation efficiencies with the other works are depicted in Table 3. From the comparison, we found that our DBD system shows significant removal efficiencies of up to 75% in 60 min of the time interval at 0.538 watts, while all other AOPs, even with higher powers, have lower degradation efficiencies. Although some studies mentioned a higher energy efficiency, they used more power and higher power leads to greater degradation efficiencies. Our DBD system modification reduces the power consumption and still reaches the significant NB degradation efficiencies.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the DBD system was developed for the degradation of nitrobenzene and its effectiveness was evaluated on the basis of different parameters. The results showed that the degradation of NB was significantly improved by increasing the voltage, gas flow rate and with the addition of promoters to the system while it was decreased with the addition of inhibitors and also decreased with the presence of methanol. Oxygen was the best carrier gas out of air and nitrogen gave the maximum degradation efficiencies of NB. Increasing the flow rate of oxygen further increase the degradation efficiency by producing more active species. Ozone and hydroxyl radicles were found to be the promising active species governing the efficiency trends in the DBD system. These active species were scavenged greatly by the addition of methanol, decreasing the NB degradation efficiency. Addition of promotors H2O2 and Fe2+ the NB degradation was inclined. Comparison of this system with other AOPs for the degradation efficiency, input power, reaction kinetics, treatment time and energy yield verified the importance of this system and its effectiveness. This study demonstrated that DBD plasma is an effective technology for the degradation of nitrobenzene and further suggest its application to industrial-scale treatment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.I.N.; Data curation, M.I.N., T.G. and H.W.; Formal analysis, M.A.; Funding acquisition, C.Y.; Investigation, P.J.A. and H.W.; Methodology, M.I.N. and T.G.; Project administration, C.Y.; Resources, C.Y.; Supervision, C.Y.; Visualization, P.J.A. Writing–original draft, M.I.N.; Writing–review & editing, M.I.N.; A.M.Z. and A.A.

Funding

This research was supported by the project Science and Technology Support Program of Jiangsu Province (Project No. BE2011732).

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the funding support from the project Science and Technology Support Program of Jiangsu Province (Project No. BE2011732). Additionally, the authors would like to express their sincere appreciation to the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wen, Q.; Chen, Z.; Lian, J.; Feng, Y.; Ren, N. Removal of nitrobenzene from aqueous solution by a novel lipoid adsorption material (LAM). J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 209, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wei, W.; Sun, R.; Cui, J.; Wei, Z. Removal of nitrobenzene from aqueous solution by adsorption on nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite. Desalination 2010, 263, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, K.; Dai, C.; Zhou, X.; Si, H. An enhanced Fenton reaction catalyzed by natural heterogeneous pyrite for nitrobenzene degradation in an aqueous solution. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 244, 438–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. ElShafei, G.M.; Yehia, F.Z.; Dimitry, O.I.; Badawi, A.M.; Eshaq, G. Degradation of nitrobenzene at near neutral pH using Fe2+–glutamate complex as a homogeneous Fenton catalyst. Appl. Catal. B Environm. 2010, 99, 242–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nawaz, M.I.; Yi, C.W.; Ni, L.X.; Zhao, H.; Wang, H.J.; Yi, R.J.; Yin, L.L.; Aleem, M.; Zaman, M. Removal of nitrobenzene from wastewater by vertical flow constructed wetland and optimizing substrate composition using Hydrus-1D: Optimizing substrate composition of vertical flow constructed wetland for removing nitrobenzene from wastewater. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhao, L.; Ma, J.; Sun, Z.-Z. Oxidation products and pathway of ceramic honeycomb-catalyzed ozonation for the degradation of nitrobenzene in aqueous solution. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2008, 79, 244–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Reddy, P.M.K.; Raju, B.R.; Karuppiah, J.; Reddy, E.L.; Subrahmanyam, C. Degradation and mineralization of methylene blue by dielectric barrier discharge non-thermal plasma reactor. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 217, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xu, G.-M.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, G.-J. DBD Plasma Jet in Atmospheric Pressure Argon. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2008, 36, 1352–1353. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhang, Q.; Qu, G.; Wang, T.; Li, C.; Qiang, H.; Sun, Q.; Liang, D.; Hu, S. Humic acid removal from micro-polluted source water in the presence of inorganic salts in a gas-phase surface discharge plasma system. Purif. Technol. 2017, 187, 334–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, C.; Wu, J.; Ren, L.; Tong, J.; Li, J.; Cui, N.; Brown, N.; Meenan, B. Comparative study on the effect of RF and DBD plasma treatment on PTFE surface modification. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2004, 85, 340–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ren, C.-S.; Wang, K.; Nie, Q.-Y.; Wang, D.-Z.; Guo, S.-H. Surface modification of PE film by DBD plasma in air. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008, 255, 3421–3425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rudolph, R.; Francke, K.-P.; Miessner, H. Concentration Dependence of VOC Decomposition by Dielectric Barrier Discharges. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2002, 22, 401–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Karuppiah, J.; Reddy, E.L.; Reddy, P.M.K.; Ramaraju, B.; Karvembu, R.; Subrahmanyam, C. Abatement of mixture of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in a catalytic non-thermal plasma reactor. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 237, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kuai, P.-Y.; Liu, C.-J.; Huo, P.-P. Characterization of CuO-ZnO Catalyst Prepared by Decomposition of Carbonates Using Dielectric-Barrier Discharge Plasma. Catal. Lett. 2009, 129, 493–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Malik, M.A. Water Purification by Plasmas: Which Reactors are Most Energy Efficient? Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2010, 30, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, Q.; Xue, Q.; Jiang, B.; Zheng, J.; Qiu, S.; Wu, M.; Yan, Z. Review on electrical discharge plasma technology for wastewater remediation. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 236, 348–368. [Google Scholar]
  17. Mok, Y.S.; Jo, J.-O. Degradation of Organic Contaminant by Using Dielectric Barrier Discharge Reactor Immersed in Wastewater. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2006, 34, 2624–2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Huang, F.; Chen, L.; Wang, H.; Yan, Z. Analysis of the degradation mechanism of methylene blue by atmospheric pressure dielectric barrier discharge plasma. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 162, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, R.; Liu, Y.; Cheng, W.; Zhang, W.; Xue, G.; Ognier, S. Study on remediation of phenanthrene contaminated soil by pulsed dielectric barrier discharge plasma: The role of active species. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 296, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bogaerts, A.; Neyts, E.; Gijbels, R.; Van Der Mullen, J. Gas discharge plasmas and their applications. Spectrochim. Acta Part B At. Spectrosc. 2002, 57, 609–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Locke, B.R.; Sato, M.; Sunka, P.; Hoffmann, M.R.; Chang, J.-S. Electrohydraulic Discharge and Nonthermal Plasma for Water Treatment. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2006, 45, 882–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hong, Z.H.; Chengwu, Y.I.; Rongjie, Y.I.; Huijuan, W.A.; Lanlan, Y.I.; Muhammad, I.N.; Zhongfei, M.A. Research on the degradation mechanism of dimethyl phthalate in drinking water by strong ionization discharge. Plasma Sci. Technol. 2018, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, Y.; Yi, R.; Yi, C.; Zhou, B.; Wang, H. Research on the degradation mechanism of pyridine in drinking water by dielectric barrier discharge. J. Environ. Sci. 2017, 53, 238–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Deng, Y.; Zhao, R. Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs) in Wastewater Treatment. Pollut. Rep. 2015, 1, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Brandenburg, R. Dielectric barrier discharges: Progress on plasma sources and on the understanding of regimes and single filaments. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 2017, 26, 053001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, S.; Ma, X.; Jiang, Y.; Cao, X. Acetamiprid removal in wastewater by the low-temperature plasma using dielectric barrier discharge. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2014, 106, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Cui, S.; Liu, X.; Liu, Y.; Shen, X.; Lin, B.; Han, G.; Wu, Z. Adsorption properties of nitrobenzene in wastewater with silica aerogels. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 2010, 53, 2367–2371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xia, K.; Xie, F.; Ma, Y. Degradation of nitrobenzene in aqueous solution by dual-pulse ultrasound enhanced electrochemical process. Ultrason. Sonochemistry 2014, 21, 549–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tang, S.; Lu, N.; Shang, K.; Li, J.; Wu, Y. Detection of hydroxyl radicals during regeneration of granular activated carbon in dielectric barrier discharge plasma system. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2013, 418, 012104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Zhu, D.; Jiang, L.; Liu, R.-L.; Chen, P.; Lang, L.; Feng, J.-W.; Yuan, S.-J.; Zhao, D.-Y. Wire–cylinder dielectric barrier discharge induced degradation of aqueous atrazine. Chemosphere 2014, 117, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, X.; Bian, W.; Song, X.; Liu, D.; Zhang, J. Degradation of 4-chlorophenol in a dielectric barrier discharge system. Purif. Technol. 2013, 120, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hu, Y.; Bai, Y.; Li, X.; Chen, J. Application of dielectric barrier discharge plasma for degradation and pathways of dimethoate in aqueous solution. Purif. Technol. 2013, 120, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sun, M.J.; Zhang, C.; Yang, C.; Zhang, T. Degradation of Nitrobenzene by Nano-TiO2/PVDF Membrane Catalytic Ozonation; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  34. Bai, J.; Liu, Y.; Yin, X.; Duan, H.; Ma, J. Efficient removal of nitrobenzene by Fenton-like process with Co-Fe layered double hydroxide. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 416, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Weizhou, J.; Youzhi, L.; Wenli, L.; Jing, L.; Fan, S.; Chaoran, W. Degradation of Nitrobenzene-Containing Wastewater with O3 and H2O2 by High Gravity Technology; China Petroleum Processing & Petrochemical Technology: Beijing, China, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  36. Feng, J.; Zheng, Z.; Sun, Y.; Luan, J.; Wang, Z.; Wang, L.; Feng, J. Degradation of diuron in aqueous solution by dielectric barrier discharge. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 154, 1081–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Duan, H.; Liu, Y.; Yin, X.; Bai, J.; Qi, J. Degradation of nitrobenzene by Fenton-like reaction in a H2O2/schwertmannite system. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 283, 873–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Iervolino, G.; Vaiano, V.; Palma, V. Enhanced Removal of Water Pollutants by Dielectric Barrier Discharge Non-Thermal Plasma Reactor; Separation and Purification Technology: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 155–162. [Google Scholar]
  39. Shen, J.; Chen, Z.; Li, X.; Qi, F.; Ye, M. The efficiency and mechanism of the degradation of nitrobenzene in aqueous solution by O3/H2O2. Water Sci. Technol. 2006, 6, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yin, W.; Wu, J.; Li, P.; Wang, X.; Zhu, N.; Wu, P.; Yang, B. Experimental study of zero-valent iron induced nitrobenzene reduction in groundwater: The effects of pH, iron dosage, oxygen and common dissolved anions. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 184, 198–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dong, Y.; He, K.; Yin, L.; Zhang, A. Catalytic Degradation of Nitrobenzene and Aniline in Presence of Ozone by Magnesia from Natural Mineral. Catal. Lett. 2007, 119, 222–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zaleska, A.; Hupka, J.; Wiergowski, M.; Biziuk, M. Photocatalytic degradation of lindane, p,p′-DDT and methoxychlor in an aqueous environment. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2000, 135, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kuşvuran, E.; Samil, A.; Atanur, O.M.; Erbatur, O. Photocatalytic degradation kinetics of di- and tri-substituted phenolic compounds in aqueous solution by TiO2/UV. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2005, 58, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Farré, M.J.; Franch, M.I.; Malato, S.; Ayllón, J.A.; Peral, J.; Domènech, X. Degradation of some biorecalcitrant pesticides by homogeneous and heterogeneous photocatalytic ozonation. Chemosphere 2005, 58, 1127–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Magureanu, M.; Mandache, N.B.; Parvulescu, V.I. Degradation of pharmaceutical compounds in water by non-thermal plasma treatment. Water Res. 2015, 81, 124–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zhang, H.; Li, K.; Shu, C.; Lou, Z.; Sun, T.; Jia, J. Enhancement of styrene removal using a novel double-tube dielectric barrier discharge (DDBD) reactor. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 256, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kostov, K.; Honda, R.Y.; Alves, L.; Kayama, M. Characteristics of dielectric barrier discharge reactor for material treatment. Braz. J. Phys. 2009, 39, 322–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Karuppiah, J.; Karvembu, R.; Subrahmanyam, C. The catalytic effect of MnOx and CoOx on the decomposition of nitrobenzene in a non-thermal plasma reactor. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 180, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, L.; Jiang, X.; Liu, Y. Efficient Degradation of Nitrobenzene Induced by Glow Discharge Plasma in Aqueous Solution. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2007, 27, 504–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Appleton, A.T.; Lukes, P.; Finney, W.C.; Locke, B.R. A Study of the Effectiveness of Different Hybrid Pulsed Corona reactors in Degrading Aqueous Pollutants. Ph.D. Thesis, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  51. Vanraes, P.; Willems, G.; Nikiforov, A.; Surmont, P.; Lynen, F.; Vandamme, J.; Van Durme, J.; Verheust, Y.P.; Van Hulle, S.W.; Dumoulin, A.; et al. Removal of atrazine in water by combination of activated carbon and dielectric barrier discharge. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 299, 647–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Achilleos, A.; Hapeshi, E.; Xekoukoulotakis, N.P.; Mantzavinos, D.; Fatta-Kassinos, D. Factors affecting diclofenac decomposition in water by UV-A/TiO2 photocatalysis. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 161, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Panorel, I.; Preis, S.; Kornev, I.; Hatakka, H.; Louhi-Kultanen, M. Oxidation of aqueous pharmaceuticals by pulsed corona discharge. Environ. Technol. 2013, 34, 923–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wang, L.; Jiang, X. Unusual catalytic effects of iron salts on phenol degradation by glow discharge plasma in aqueous solution. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 161, 926–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Grymonpré, D.R.; Finney, W.C.; Locke, B.R. Aqueous-phase pulsed streamer corona reactor using suspended activated carbon particles for phenol oxidation: Model-data comparison. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1999, 54, 3095–3105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Du, C.M.; Yan, J.H.; Cheron, B.G. Degradation of 4-Chlorophenol using a Gas–Liquid Gliding Arc Discharge Plasma Reactor. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2007, 27, 635–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The molecular structure of Nitrobenzene (NB).
Figure 1. The molecular structure of Nitrobenzene (NB).
Water 11 00842 g001
Figure 2. The schematic illustration of the experimental setup for the dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) system assisted nitrobenzene degradation with the illustration of the DBD reactor assembly.
Figure 2. The schematic illustration of the experimental setup for the dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) system assisted nitrobenzene degradation with the illustration of the DBD reactor assembly.
Water 11 00842 g002
Figure 3. A plot of the calibration curve between different concentrations (at time intervals) and absorbance (at 262 nm of wavelength) values of nitrobenzene (NB).
Figure 3. A plot of the calibration curve between different concentrations (at time intervals) and absorbance (at 262 nm of wavelength) values of nitrobenzene (NB).
Water 11 00842 g003
Figure 4. (a) The effect of voltage on the production of ozone, (b) The variation in the ozone concentrations in air and water streams.
Figure 4. (a) The effect of voltage on the production of ozone, (b) The variation in the ozone concentrations in air and water streams.
Water 11 00842 g004
Figure 5. The effect of different carrier gases on the degradation of NB in the DBD reactor, at NB concentration of 20 mg/L, gas flow rate of 3 L/min and an applied voltage of 1.8 kV.
Figure 5. The effect of different carrier gases on the degradation of NB in the DBD reactor, at NB concentration of 20 mg/L, gas flow rate of 3 L/min and an applied voltage of 1.8 kV.
Water 11 00842 g005
Figure 6. The effect of different oxygen flow rates on the degradation of NB in the DBD reactor, at an NB concentration of 20 mg/L and an applied voltage of 1.8 kV.
Figure 6. The effect of different oxygen flow rates on the degradation of NB in the DBD reactor, at an NB concentration of 20 mg/L and an applied voltage of 1.8 kV.
Water 11 00842 g006
Figure 7. The effect of different hydroxyl radical scavengers on the degradation of NB, at an NB concentration of 20 mg/L, an oxygen flow rate of 3 L/min, and an applied voltage of 1.8 kV. (a) Effect of carbonate ions; (b) Effect of bicarbonate ions; (c) Effect of tertiary butyl alcohol (TBA) and (d) Effect of isopropyl alcohol (IPA).
Figure 7. The effect of different hydroxyl radical scavengers on the degradation of NB, at an NB concentration of 20 mg/L, an oxygen flow rate of 3 L/min, and an applied voltage of 1.8 kV. (a) Effect of carbonate ions; (b) Effect of bicarbonate ions; (c) Effect of tertiary butyl alcohol (TBA) and (d) Effect of isopropyl alcohol (IPA).
Water 11 00842 g007
Figure 8. The effect of the addition of different promotor on the degradation of NB, at an NB concentration of 20 mg/L, an oxygen flow rate of 3 L/min, and an applied voltage of 1.8 kV.
Figure 8. The effect of the addition of different promotor on the degradation of NB, at an NB concentration of 20 mg/L, an oxygen flow rate of 3 L/min, and an applied voltage of 1.8 kV.
Water 11 00842 g008
Figure 9. The effect of the addition of different methanol concentrations of NB degradation at an NB concentration of 20 mg/L, an oxygen flow rate of 3 L/min, and an applied voltage of 1.8 kV.
Figure 9. The effect of the addition of different methanol concentrations of NB degradation at an NB concentration of 20 mg/L, an oxygen flow rate of 3 L/min, and an applied voltage of 1.8 kV.
Water 11 00842 g009
Figure 10. The total organic carbon (TOC) removal efficiency and NB degradation efficiency by the BDB system at an NB concentration of 20 mg/L, an oxygen flow rate of 3 L/min, and an applied voltage of 1.8 kV.
Figure 10. The total organic carbon (TOC) removal efficiency and NB degradation efficiency by the BDB system at an NB concentration of 20 mg/L, an oxygen flow rate of 3 L/min, and an applied voltage of 1.8 kV.
Water 11 00842 g010
Figure 11. (a) The Charge-Voltage (Q-V) waveform and (b) Lissajous curve at 1.8 kV and 50 Hz.
Figure 11. (a) The Charge-Voltage (Q-V) waveform and (b) Lissajous curve at 1.8 kV and 50 Hz.
Water 11 00842 g011
Table 1. The main characteristic conditions of the Dielectric Barrier Discharge (DBD) system.
Table 1. The main characteristic conditions of the Dielectric Barrier Discharge (DBD) system.
ParametersValues
Oxygen Concentration 3 L/min
Gas pressure≥0.1 MPa
Water circulation flow rate 1.0 m3/h
Voltage range1.0–1.8 kV
Average electron energy>0 eV
Sample barrel volume 40 L
Water temperature 20 °C
Table 2. The reaction kinetics comparison with other advanced oxidation processes (AOPs).
Table 2. The reaction kinetics comparison with other advanced oxidation processes (AOPs).
Treatment SystemType of WaterInitial Conc. (mg/L) Treatment TimeDegradation (%)K
(min−1)
R2References
DBD reactorNitrobenzene 2060 min750.02370.9983current work
ZVI reductionNitrobenzene258 h560.01650.1038[40]
Pyrite Fenton systemNitrobenzene205 h770.01130.9644[3]
Catalytic ozonationNitrobenzene100120 min550.0065-[41]
UV/TiO2/O2 photocatalysisLindane4090 min550.60 -[42]
TiO2/UV photocatalysis2,4-dibromophenol25–12630 min53–140.025–0.0056 -[43]
Photo-Fenton/O3Atrazine355 min66 0.24 -[44]
Table 3. The comparison of the DBD system with other AOPs for power, energy yield and degradation efficiency.
Table 3. The comparison of the DBD system with other AOPs for power, energy yield and degradation efficiency.
Treatment SystemType of WaterInitial Conc. (mg/L) Treatment Time (min)Power (W)Energy Yield (mg/kWh)Degradation (%)References
DBD reactorNitrobenzene20600.5381.2575current work
Glow discharge plasmaNitrobenzene5060-0.151250[49]
PCD Reference reactorNitrobenzene1060660.06735[50]
PCD Hybrid-series reactorNitrobenzene1060660.03065[50]
Pyrite Fenton systemNitrobenzene20300--77[3]
Classic Fenton systemNitrobenzene20300--30[3]
DBD reactorAtrazine0.0320272.2550[51]
TiO2 photocatalysisdiclofenac10240982.685[52]
Corona with liquid showerb-Oestradiol330120140070[53]
Contact glow discharge reactor/point-platephenol100304434061[54]
Pulsed liquid dischargephenol100155557040[55]
Gas/liquid gliding arc discharge4-Chlorophenol4076230102089[56]
* PCD: Pulsed corona discharge.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nawaz, M.I.; Yi, C.; Asilevi, P.J.; Geng, T.; Aleem, M.; Zafar, A.M.; Azeem, A.; Wang, H. A Study of the Performance of Dielectric Barrier Discharge under Different Conditions for Nitrobenzene Degradation. Water 2019, 11, 842. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11040842

AMA Style

Nawaz MI, Yi C, Asilevi PJ, Geng T, Aleem M, Zafar AM, Azeem A, Wang H. A Study of the Performance of Dielectric Barrier Discharge under Different Conditions for Nitrobenzene Degradation. Water. 2019; 11(4):842. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11040842

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nawaz, Muhammad Imran, Chengwu Yi, Prince Junior Asilevi, Tingting Geng, Muhammad Aleem, Abdul Mannan Zafar, Ahmad Azeem, and Huijuan Wang. 2019. "A Study of the Performance of Dielectric Barrier Discharge under Different Conditions for Nitrobenzene Degradation" Water 11, no. 4: 842. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11040842

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop