When the world gets closer.

We help you see farther.

Sign up to our expressly international daily newsletter.

Already a subscriber? Log in .

You've reached your limit of one free article.

Get unlimited access to Worldcrunch

You can cancel anytime .

SUBSCRIBERS BENEFITS

Exclusive International news coverage

Ad-free experience NEW

Weekly digital Magazine NEW

9 daily & weekly Newsletters

Access to Worldcrunch archives

Free trial

30-days free access, then $2.90
per month.

Annual Access BEST VALUE

$19.90 per year, save $14.90 compared to monthly billing.save $14.90.

Subscribe to Worldcrunch
Geopolitics

Showdown Of Populists From Left And Right Looms In Colombia Presidential Runoff

Colombians spurned the establishment candidates in the first round of presidential voting. In the second round, on June 19, they will have to choose between Gustavo Petro, a former Marxist guerrilla, and Rodolfo Hernández a "tough-talking" businessman being compared to Donald Trump.

Photo of people holding a presidential election ballot in Bogota, Colombia

Electoral jury hands out presidential election ballots during the 2022 presidential elections in Bogota, Colombia

El Espectador

-Editorial-

BOGOTÁ — Colombians went out on May 29 to make themselves heard. Early figures showed participation was higher than the first round of presidential elections in 2018, and what we saw was a motivated citizen body actively taking part in the elections to make an impact. It was a relief that — after years of social tensions — Colombians found in voting an eloquent language with which to express themselves.


The National Civil Registry also worked impeccably to dispel the unfounded fears of electoral fraud, after facing criticisms for months.

The chief loser of the election was President Iván Duque, whose electoral interventions were brazen, followed by the political parties and clans that have dominated Colombian politics in past decades.

Rejecting the establishment

The conservative current led by former president Álvaro Uribe, which effectively chose our presidents for the past 20 years except for Juan Manuel Santos's (2014) reelection, also lost. Federico Gutiérrez was clearly the continuity candidate, and President Duque intervened in his favor, which we criticized several times.

Gutiérrez had the support of the political establishment: the Democratic Center (Uribe's party), the Conservatives and the Liberals, the (center-right) U party, the Team Colombia (Equipo por Colombia) coalition (of which Gutiérrez was a co-founder), and powerful, regional clans. His defeat was both surprising and decisive, and showed Colombians have had enough of the same political names and brands. This makes the election a time for profound reflections.

Supporter of PeA supporter of left-wing candidate Gustavo Petro holds a campaign poster during the elections on May 29, 2022tro

Gustavo Petro supporter on May 29

Sebastian Maya/LongVisual/ZUMA

Defend democracy

Both the socialist Gustavo Petro and independent businessman Rodolfo Hernández, who will be competing in a second round — situated at opposite ends politically — represent a rejection of the political establishment.

Petro has devoted his political career to presenting himself as the opposite of the ideas defended by Uribe and his successor, Duque, who beat him to the presidency four years ago.

Hernández, while closer to the conservative currents that have been ruling the country, campaigned denouncing a political class he dubbed "corrupt" when he wasn't using uglier words. Between them they won almost 69% of all votes cast in the first round, which would have been unthinkable some years back.

Echoes Of Trump and Bolsonaro 

Yet the change voters want must be constructed and implemented, and questions arise when a populist will be the executor of that change.

Colombians would do well to demand campaigns that clearly defend the country's democratic institutions.

Both candidates adopted a populist discourse, even displaying authoritarian traits, though Hernández was ahead of Petro in that sense. His campaign was built on a simplistic but aggressive discourse that spoke of "them," of "bad folk" against us "good folk." His political strategy has been rightly compared to those of presidents Donald J. Trump and Jair Bolsonaro.

In the second round of voting, Colombians would do well to demand campaigns that clearly defend the country's democratic institutions. Because it is through those institutions that the nation's hopes for change, expressed in the first round of voting, can come to fruition without turning into enormous frustration, with unpredictable consequences.

You've reached your limit of free articles.

To read the full story, start your free trial today.

Get unlimited access. Cancel anytime.

Exclusive coverage from the world's top sources, in English for the first time.

Insights from the widest range of perspectives, languages and countries.

Society

García Márquez's Final Novel And The Eternal Beauty Of The Unfinished

The late Nobel Prize-winning Colombian author's sons have published his draft novel See You in August against his will. Yet no work of art is ever really finished. And excerpts and fragments are suited to our anxious times.

Photo of the book cover of ​Gabo's newly-published En agosto nos vemos ("See You in August")

Gabo's newly-published En agosto nos vemos ("See You in August")

William Ospina

-OpEd-

BOGOTÁ — I struggle to understand the quibbling over whether or not it was right to publish En agosto nos vemos ("See You in August"), the draft of a novel by the late Nobel Prize-winning Colombian author Gabriel García Márquez. In our time more than ever, it is absurd to think that a work of art must be finished. Indeed, who can tell when a work of art really is complete? As someone observed, "finished" is a way of saying you're tired of the work.

✉️ You can receive our Bon Vivant selection of fresh reads on international culture, food & travel directly in your inbox. Subscribe here.

If it is for the author to decide, we'll find that certain literary classics are unfinished because their authors considered them so. One is Virgil's Aeneid. The Roman poet asked his friend and patron, Octavian, the future emperor Augustus, to destroy it. And we owe its very existence to the fact that he loftily ignored the request.

Keep reading...Show less

The latest