Skip to main content
Log in

Correlates of Adherence to the Dapivirine Vaginal Ring for HIV-1 Prevention

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding characteristics associated with adherence to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) methods for HIV-1 prevention may assist with optimizing implementation efforts. The dapivirine vaginal ring is a novel topical PrEP delivery method. Using data from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of the dapivirine vaginal ring conducted in four African countries, generalized estimating equation models were used to evaluate correlates of ring adherence. Two levels of quarterly dapivirine blood plasma, and dapivirine released from returned rings defined measures of adherence for recent and cumulative use, respectively. Time on study, calendar time, primary partner knowledge that the participant was taking part in the study, and use of long-acting contraceptive methods were associated with ring adherence whereas younger age, ring worries, condom use, episodes of menstrual bleeding and vaginal washing were associated with non-adherence. These findings may be useful for recruitment into future clinical studies and dapivirine ring implementation efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. UNAIDS Data 2019. Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. Available at: https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/2019-UNAIDS-data_en.pdf.

  2. The Prevention Gap Report: Summary. Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, 2016. Available at: https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/2016PreventionGapReportsummary_en.pdf.

  3. Baeten JM, Donnell D, Ndase P, et al. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV prevention in heterosexual men and women. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:399–410.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Choopanya K, Martin M, Suntharasamai P, et al. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV infection in injecting drug users in Bangkok, Thailand (the Bangkok Tenofovir Study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013;381:2083–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, et al. Pre-exposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2587–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Marrazzo JM, Ramjee G, Richardson BA, et al. Tenofovir based pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV infection among African women. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:509–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Damme L, Corneli A, Ahmed K, et al. Preexposure prophylaxis for HIV infection among African women. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(5):411–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rees H, Delany-Moretlwe S, Lombard C, et al. FACTS 001 phase III trial of pericoital tenofovir 1% gel for HIV prevention in women CROI 2015: presented at the conference on retroviruses and opportunistic infections, Boston, February 23–26, 2015. Abstract.

  9. Nel A, van Niekerk N, Kapiga S, et al. Safety and efficacy of a dapivirine vaginal ring for HIV prevention in women. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:2133–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Baeten JM, Palanee-Phillips T, Brown ER, et al. Use of a vaginal ring containing dapivirine for HIV-1 prevention in women. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:2121–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Palanee-Phillips T, Schwartz K, Brown ER, et al. Characteristics of women enrolled into a randomized clinical trial of dapivirine vaginal ring for HIV-1 prevention. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(6):e0128857. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128857.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Husnik MJ, Brown ER, Marzinke M, et al. Implementation of a novel adherence monitoring strategy in a phase III, blinded, placebo-controlled, HIV-1 prevention clinical trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;76:330–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Seserko LA, Emory JF, Hendrix CW, et al. The development and validation of an UHPLC-MS/MS method for the rapid quantification of the antiretroviral agent dapivirine in human plasma. Bioanalysis. 2013;5(22):2771–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Podsadecki TJ, Vrijens BC, Tousset EP, et al. “White coat compliance” limits the reliability of therapeutic drug monitoring in HIV-1—infected patients. HIV Clin Trials. 2008;9(4):238–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nel A, Haazen W, Nuttall J, et al. A safety and pharmacokinetic trial assessing delivery of dapivirine from a vaginal ring in healthy women. AIDS. 2014;28(10):1479–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nel AM, Haazen W, Nuttall JP, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety assessment of anti-HIV dapivirine vaginal microbicide rings with multiple dosing. J AIDS Clin Res. 2014;5:355.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nel A, Bekker LG, Bukusi E, et al. Safety, acceptability and adherence of dapivirine vaginal ring in a microbicide clinical trial conducted in multiple countries in sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0147743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Spence P, Nel A, van Niekerk N, et al. Post-use assay of vaginal rings (VRs) as a potential measure of clinical trial adherence. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2016;125:94–100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Brown ER, Hendrix CW, van der Straten A, et al. Greater dapivirine release from the dapivirine vaginal ring is correlated with lower risk of HIV-1 acquisition: a secondary analysis from a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Int AIDS Soc. 2020;23:11.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cohen R, Rodriguez R. "High-Performance Statistical Modeling". In: Proceedings of the SAS Global Forum Conference. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 2013

  21. Weinrib R, Minnis A, Agot K, et al. End-users’ product preference across three multipurpose prevention technology delivery forms: baseline results from young women in Kenya and South. AIDS Behav. 2018;22:133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Montgomery ET, van der Straten A, Chitukuta M, et al. Acceptability and use of a dapivirine vaginal ring in a phase III trial. AIDS. 2017;31(8):1159–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Montgomery ET, van der Straten A, Cheng H, et al. Vaginal ring adherence in sub-Saharan Africa: expulsion, removal, and perfect use. AIDS Behav. 2012;7:1787–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. van der Straten A, Montgomery E, Cheng H, et al. High acceptability of a vaginal ring intended as a microbicide delivery method for HIV prevention in African women. AIDS Behav. 2012;16:1775–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Karim AQ, Karim AS, Frohlich JA, et al. Effectiveness and safety of tenofovir gel, an antiretroviral microbicide for the prevention of HIV infection in women. Science. 2010;329(5996):1168–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Donnell D, Baeten JM, Bumpus NN, et al. HIV protective efficacy and correlates of tenofovir blood concentrations in a clinical trial of PrEP for HIV prevention. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;66:340–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Blanc AK, Tsui AO, Croft TN, Trevitt JL. Patterns and trends in adolescents’ contraceptive use and discontinuation in developing countries and comparisons with adult women. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2009;35:63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Evans D, Menezes C, Mahomed K, et al. Treatment outcomes of HIV-infected adolescents attending public-sector HIV clinics across Gauteng and Mpumalanga. South Africa AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2013;29:892–900.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. van der Straten A, Stadler J, Montgomery E, et al. Women’s experiences with oral and vaginal pre-exposure prophylaxis: the VOICE-C qualitative study in Johannesburg, South Africa. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(2):e89118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Corneli A, Perry B, McKenna K, et al. Participants’ explanations for non-adherence in the FEM-PrEP clinical trial. JAIDS J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;71(4):452–461. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000880

  31. Browne EN, Mayo AJ, Montgomery E, et al. Acceptability of and adherence to the dapivirine vaginal ring for HIV 1 prevention. Adherence 2019, June 17, 2019, Miami, FL.

  32. van der Straten A, Browne E, Shapley-Quinn MK, et al. First impressions matter: how initial worries influence adherence to the dapivirine vaginal ring. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019;81:304–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Duby Z, Katz AWK, Browne EN, et al. Hygiene, blood flow, and vaginal overload: why women removed an HIV prevention vaginal ring during menstruation in Malawi, South Africa, Uganda and Zimbabwe. AIDS Behav. 2019;24:617–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Balkus JE, Palanee-Phillips T, Reddy K, et al. Dapivirine vaginal ring use does not diminish the effectiveness of hormonal contraception. Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;76:e47–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Mensch BS, Richardson BA, Husnik M, et al. Vaginal ring use in a phase 3 microbicide trial: a comparison of objective measures and self-reports of non-adherence in ASPIRE. AIDS Behav. 2019;23:504–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank the MTN-020/ASPIRE study team, including those who made the dapivirine laboratory testing possible, as well as the dedication of all study participants. MTN-020/ASPIRE Study Team: Study Team Leadership: Jared Baeten, University of Washington (Protocol Chair); Thesla Palanee-Phillips, Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute (Protocol Co-chair); Elizabeth Brown, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (Protocol Statistician); Lydia Soto-Torres, US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (Medical Officer); Katie Schwartz, FHI 360 (Clinical Research Manager). Study sites and site Investigators of Record: Malawi, Blantyre site (Johns Hopkins University, Queen Elizabeth Hospital): Bonus Makanani; Malawi, Lilongwe site (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill): Francis Martinson. South Africa, Cape Town site (University of Cape Town): Linda-Gail Bekker; South Africa, Durban – Botha’s Hill, Chatsworth, Isipingo, Tongaat, Umkomaas, Verulam sites (South African Medical Research Council): Vaneshree Govender, Samantha Siva, Zakir Gaffoor, Logashvari Naidoo, Arendevi Pather, and Nitesha Jeenarain; South Africa, Durban, eThekwini site (Center for the AIDS Programme for Research in South Africa): Gonasagrie Nair; South Africa, Johannesburg site (Wits RHI): Thesla Palanee-Phillips; Uganda, Kampala site (John Hopkins University, Makerere University): Flavia Matovu; Zimbabwe, Chitungwiza, Seke South and Zengeza sites (University of Zimbabwe, University of California San Francisco): Nyaradzo Mgodi; Zimbabwe, Harare, Spilhaus site (University of Zimbabwe, University of California San Francisco): Felix Mhlanga. Data management was provided by The Statistical Center for HIV/AIDS Research & Prevention (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA) and site laboratory oversight was provided by the Microbicide Trials Network Laboratory Center (Pittsburgh, PA).

Funding

The MTN-020/ASPIRE study was designed and implemented by the Microbicide Trials Network (MTN). The MTN is funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (UM1AI068633, UM1AI068615, UM1AI106707), with co-funding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the National Institute of Mental Health, all components of the U.S. National Institutes of Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The vaginal rings used in this study were developed and supplied by the International Partnership for Microbicides (IPM).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jared M. Baeten.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Financial interests—Dr. Jared M. Baeten has received research grants from NIH, CDC, USAID, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Non-financial interests—Dr. Jared M. Baeten has served on advisory boards for Gilead Sciences, Janssen, and Merck corporations.

Ethical Approval

Institutional review boards at each participating clinical site approved the study protocol. In obtaining and documenting informed consent, the investigator of record and their designees complied with applicable local and US regulatory requirements and adhered to Good Clinical Practices and ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent

All participants provided written informed consent for participation and specimen storage.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Husnik, M.J., Brown, E.R., Dadabhai, S.S. et al. Correlates of Adherence to the Dapivirine Vaginal Ring for HIV-1 Prevention. AIDS Behav 25, 2801–2814 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-021-03231-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-021-03231-x

Keywords

Navigation