Skip to main content
Log in

“You Don’t Want to Be a Candidate for Punishment”: a Qualitative Analysis of LGBT Service Member “Outness”

  • Published:
Sexuality Research and Social Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Policies regarding lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) military service members in the U.S. have changed dramatically over the last nine years. Cisgender LGB service members can now disclose their authentic identity without threat of discharge. Open transgender service was banned, then permitted, then banned again. Limited empirical evidence exists to assess the wellbeing of the estimated 74,000 LGBT service members who have served during these changes. This study seeks to address this gap by exploring the “coming out” experiences of LGBT service members following repeal of LGBT bans.

Methods

In-depth interviews were conducted with 37 active duty LGBT military members in the Army, Air Force, Navy, and Marines stationed on American military bases worldwide in 2016.

Results

Thematic analysis of these data found that half of participants feared that the military environment, at both the institutional and interpersonal level, is not yet LGBT inclusive. However, most participants employed outness in the military as a means of presenting their authentic identity to others and paving the way for other LGBT service members to be “out.”

Conclusions

While repeal of LGBT bans provide a sense of institutional protection and improvement in quality of life among LGBT service members, barriers to disclosure remain. As the “first generation” serving after repeals, this population weighs perceived risks and benefits to disclosure as they determine what it looks like to be an openly LGBT military member.

Policy Implications

Results from the present analysis suggest retention of LGB-affirming regulations and re-implementation of transgender-inclusive policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs through the Psychological Health/Traumatic Brain Injury Research Program overseen by the US Army Medical Research and Development Command, under award no. W81XWH-15-1-0701. The US Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity, 820 Chandler Street, Fort Detrick MD 21702-5014 is the awarding and administering acquisition office. Opinions, interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Department of Defense.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathleen A. McNamara.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McNamara, K.A., Lucas, C.L., Goldbach, J.T. et al. “You Don’t Want to Be a Candidate for Punishment”: a Qualitative Analysis of LGBT Service Member “Outness”. Sex Res Soc Policy 18, 144–159 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-020-00445-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-020-00445-x

Keywords

Navigation