Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Predictors of portable technology adoption intentions to support elementary children reading

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Much attention has focused on technology acceptance in the classroom, with little investigation into how parents make decisions about their children’s use of portable technology to support reading development in the home. Applying the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, this study identifies predictors of parents portable technology adoption intentions to support children’s reading development in the home. Participants were parents from two elementary schools within 46 classrooms in the southeastern United States. Phase one of data collection included 120 parents who responded to a validated survey that identified predictors and behavioral intention to adopt technology. The regression model explained 64% of parents have intentions to use portable technology to develop their children’s reading skills, with social influence and attitude as the most important predictors. Surveys indicated 99% of children used portable technology to support reading in the home, therefore phase two included explanatory interviews to examine adoption predictors. Interview data specified social influence ensued from the child’s school and parent community; attitude resulted from children’s affinity to use technology. Though parents’ intentions indicated continued portable technology use, parents preferred their child read print books. Interview data also revealed parents perceived an increase in performance expectancy when their child used portable technology. This study highlights the need for teachers and school administrators to be cognizant of educational requests on home learning, influences of the broader parent community on parent intentions to adopt educational technology, and children’s enjoyment reading with portable technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almahboub, S. F. (2000). Attitudes toward computer use and gender differences among Kuwaiti sixth grade students. Doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas.

  • Alshare, K. A., Freeze, R., & Kwun, O. (2009). Student intention to use expert systems: An exploratory study. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49(4), 105–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, C. K., Lauricella, A. R., Wartella, E., Robb, M., & Schomburg, R. (2013). Adoption and use of technology in early education: The interplay of extrinsic barriers and teacher attitudes. Computers & Education, 69, 310–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, C. (2009). Research into literacy and technology in primary classrooms: An exploration of understandings generated by recent studies. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(1), 22–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., Wu, J., & Yang, S. C. (2008). Accelerating the use of weblogs as an alternative method to deliver case-based learning. International Journal on ELearning, 7(2), 331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2013). Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. The Psychologist, 26(2), 120–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1962). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (Vol. 2). Redwood City: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galindo, C., & Sheldon, S. B. (2012). School and home connections and children’s kindergarten achievement gains: The mediating role of family involvement. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(1), 90–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hara, S. R., & Burke, D. J. (1998). Parent involvement: The key to improved student achievement. School Community Journal, 8(2), 9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth, S., Mansaray, A., Allen, K., & Rose, A. (2011). Parents' perspectives on technology and children's learning in the home: Social class and the role of the habitus. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(4), 347–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. M. (1997). Why do parents become involved in their children’s education? Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 3–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. M. (2005). Final performance report for OERI Grant # R305T010673: The social context of parental involvement: A path to enhanced achievement. Final report, submitted to Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C. Retrieved from http://www.vanderbilt.edu/Peabody/family-school/Reports.html.

  • Hutchison, A., Beschorner, B., & Schmidt-Crawford, D. (2012). Exploring the use of the iPad for literacy learning. The Reading Teacher, 66(1), 15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Reading Association. (2009). New literacies and 21st century technologies. Newark: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jairak, K., Praneetpolgrang, P., & Mekhabunchakij, K. (2009). An acceptance of mobile learning for higher education students in Thailand. Sixth International Conference on eLearning for Knowledge-Based Society, Thailand, 17(18), 361–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korat, O., & Or, T. (2010). How new technology influences parent—child interaction: The case of e-book reading. First Language, 30(2), 139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, M., Scordino, R., Geurtz, R., Navarrete, C., Ko, Y., & Lim, M. (2014). A look at research on mobile learning in K–12 education from 2007 to the present. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 325–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miedel, W. T., & Reynolds, A. J. (2000). Parent involvement in early intervention for disadvantaged children: Does it matter? Journal of School Psychology, 37(4), 379–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, L. M., & Young, J. (1996). Parent, teacher, and child participation in a collaborative family literacy program: The effects on attitude, motivation, and literacy achievement. Reading Research Report, 64, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K., DePasquale, R., & McNamara, E. (2003). Meaningful connections: Using technology in primary classrooms. Young Children, 58(6), 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northrop, L., & Killeen, E. (2013). A framework for using iPads to build early literacy skills. The Reading Teacher, 66(7), 531–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardamean, B., & Susanto, M. (2012). Assessing user acceptance toward blog technology using the UTAUT model. International Journal of Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 1(6), 203–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parish-Morris, J., Mahajan, N., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., & Collins, M. F. (2013). Once upon a time: Parent-child dialogue and storybook reading in the electronic era. Mind, Brain, and Education, 7(3), 200–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plowman, L., Stevenson, O., Stephen, C., & McPake, J. (2012). Preschool children’s learning with technology at home. Computers & Education, 59(1), 30–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M. (2002). Effective beginning reading instruction. Journal of Literacy Research, 34(2), 165–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rideout, V., & Katz, V. S. (2016). Opportunity for all? Technology and learning in lower-income families. New York: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rideout, V., Saphir, M., Pai, S., Rudd, A., & Pritchett, J. (2013). Zero to eight: Children’s media use in America 2013 (Rep.). Retrieved from Common Sense Media https://www.commonsensemedia.org/file/zero-to-eight-2013pdf-0/download. Accessed 6 Aug 2015.

  • Singley, M. K., & Anderson, J. R. (1989). The transfer of cognitive skill. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J., Wohlstetter, P., Kuzin, C. A., & De Pedro, K. (2011). Parent involvement in urban charter schools: New strategies for increasing participation. School Community Journal, 21(1), 71–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straub, E. T. (2009). Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for informal learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 625–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1991). Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 125-143.

  • Vandewater, E. A., Rideout, V. J., Wartella, E. A., Huang, X., Lee, J. H., & Shim, M. S. (2007). Digital childhood: electronic media and technology use among infants, toddlers, and preschoolers. Pediatrics, 119(5), e1006–e1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. S., Wu, M. C., & Wang, H. Y. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 92–118.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, G. B. (2004). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, K. T., Teo, T., & Russo, S. (2012). Interactive whiteboard acceptance: Applicability of the UTAUT model to student teachers. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zickuhr, K. (2013). Tablet ownership 2013. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/06/10/tablet-ownership-2013/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle #310740, Denton, TX, 76203–5017, USA

    Lauren Eutsler

  2. University of Florida, PO Box 117048, Gainesville, FL, 32611-7048, USA

    Lauren Eutsler & Pavlo Antonenko

Authors
  1. Lauren Eutsler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pavlo Antonenko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauren Eutsler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eutsler, L., Antonenko, P. Predictors of portable technology adoption intentions to support elementary children reading. Educ Inf Technol 23, 1971–1994 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9700-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9700-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation