Hi, can you point me to this project's GitHub repo or a TOC PR with more details? I wanted to start adding the DevStats page but I can't find enough details.

@lukaszgryglicki : https://github.com/fluxcd/gitops-working-group

OK, thanks, any plans to move to a separate GitHub org?
What is the maturity level? Sanbox? Incubating?

They're just starting. The first meeting was on December 10th.

DevStats test and prod pages added.

Repo has migrated to here https://github.com/gitops-working-group/gitops-working-group/

Welcome in! I've added you to the CNCF sandbox projects page with the CNCF icon until we get a logo together.
Things to do:

• There's no website beyond Github, right?
• GitHub: ensure 'thelinuxfoundation' and 'caniszczyk' are added as initial org owners, this helps us make sure we have continuity of GH ownership
• Landscape will be under Continuous Integration & Delivery, but that needs a logo too
• Trademarks might not be necessary here

@todaywasawesome: I'm marking off a bunch of things in here because I'm assuming there's no website beyond GH. Let' me know if I'm in error.

Thank you Amye! We'll be resolving most of these issues shortly.

For logo, LP-7167 is in with our team to get you all a logo.

@dj1k: checking in here!

Hey @amye 👋

• GitHub: ensure 'thelinuxfoundation' and 'caniszczyk' are added as initial org owners, this helps us make sure we have continuity of GH ownership

Just invited them as owners to the https://github.com/gitops-working-group gh org ✔️
See gitops-working-group/gitops-working-group#99

• ServiceDesk: confirm maintainers have read https://www.cncf.io/services-for-projects/

I've opened an explicit issue in the GitOps WG repo: gitops-working-group/gitops-working-group#94

• CNCF Welcome Email Sent to confirm maintainer list access

Is there anything we need to do to help with this?

• Schedule monthly project sync with CNCF staff

I'm happy to help coordinate this in collaboration with @dj1k

Artwork is the thing that's really hanging us up, where are we on that?

The artwork logo design so far is in this github discussion proposal by @iboonox: https://github.com/gitops-working-group/gitops-working-group/discussions/63#discussioncomment-478223.

I just commented on the next steps again: https://github.com/gitops-working-group/gitops-working-group/discussions/63#discussioncomment-527026, and reached out to @iboonox. The next planned step has been to submit a PR to https://github.com/cncf/artwork once the Sandbox project name change proposal reached consensus, which it now has https://github.com/gitops-working-group/gitops-working-group/discussions/64#discussioncomment-505062. I'll keep this issue updated on progress 👍

Regarding the project name change, consensus on the new Sandbox project name is OpenGitOps, while the actual WG under CNCF SIG App Delivery will remain GitOps Working Group. Cornelia clarified that this is consistent with the plan from the Jan 26 sandbox review: https://github.com/gitops-working-group/gitops-working-group/discussions/64#discussioncomment-518708.

Also

• Website: Analytics transferred

Will do once the website is up. I made an explicit issue to track this: https://github.com/gitops-working-group/gitops-working-group/issues/95

@scottrigby: Trademarks is an outstanding issue as well, we have our agreements in: https://github.com/cncf/foundation/tree/master/agreements

👌 Added https://github.com/gitops-working-group/gitops-working-group/issues/97 to track trademark assignment. Pinged in Slack with a few questions on that one

• Artwork: Ensure logos present on https://github.com/cncf/artwork

I don't believe this one is done. Made tracking issue: gitops-working-group/gitops-working-group#100 in progress

@scottrigby:
Checking in on things from the project side:
Trademarks: transfer any trademark and logo mark assets over to the LF
GitHub: ensure 'thelinuxfoundation' and 'caniszczyk' are added as initial org owners, this helps us make sure we have continuity of GH ownership
Website: Analytics transferred

These are for CNCF staff to do:
Update https://landscape.cncf.io
ServiceDesk: confirm maintainers have read https://www.cncf.io/services-for-projects/
CNCF Welcome Email Sent to confirm maintainer list access
Schedule monthly project sync with CNCF staff

Hi Amye 👋

Trademarks: transfer any trademark and logo mark assets over to the LF

1. Just waiting for confirmation about one thing – should not be long. I believe we're using the no reg agreement.
2. Artwork status:
   • Design/logos have consensus 🎉 https://github.com/gitops-working-group/gitops-working-group/discussions/63#discussioncomment-558670
   • The detailed steps for supplying CNCF with artwork are in this issue Supply CNCF with artwork gitops-working-group/gitops-working-group#100

GitHub: ensure 'thelinuxfoundation' and 'caniszczyk' are added as initial org owners, this helps us make sure we have continuity of GH ownership

Done for both GitHub orgs:

• https://github.com/gitops-working-group
• https://github.com/open-gitops

Website: Analytics transferred

No website yet. But issue to track this is here https://github.com/gitops-working-group/gitops-working-group/issues/95

These are for CNCF staff to do:
Update https://landscape.cncf.io
ServiceDesk: confirm maintainers have read https://www.cncf.io/services-for-projects/
CNCF Welcome Email Sent to confirm maintainer list access
Schedule monthly project sync with CNCF staff

1. Just waiting for confirmation about one thing – should not be long. I believe we're using the no reg agreement.

Confirmed 👍

@amye logo assets are added to the GWG repo for now gitops-working-group/gitops-working-group#124

We will also need artwork PR in cncf/artwork.

We will also need artwork PR in cncf/artwork.

@lukaszgryglicki Thanks 👍 per @amye in gitops-working-group/gitops-working-group#124 (comment) two PRs made:

• OpenGitOps artwork artwork#233
• GitOps Working Group artwork artwork#234

BTW per maintainers-related checklist items, the MAINTAINERS file has been updated gitops-working-group/gitops-working-group#136

The maintainers have all confirmed they've read the onboarding docs gitops-working-group/gitops-working-group#94

Super!

• Artwork is the thing that's hanging the landscape up, so I know where that is.
• Website analytics are in progress, https://github.com/gitops-working-group/gitops-working-group/issues/95
• Trademarks are the last remaining!

Hi, I see there are 2 PRs for artwork - which artwork DevStats should use after PR(s) got merged?

@lukaszgryglicki the OpenGitOps artwork PR was for the Sandbox project. The GitOps WG artwork was under "other", and added just because the same person also made a cool logo for the GitOps WG under SIG App Delivery 😄

So which one should I use in DevStats?

Hi @scottrigby
Hope you are well. Checking in here on the status of website analytics (which I know were in progress) gitops-working-group/gitops-working-group#95
and the trademarks! Those are the last items remaining :)

Thank you!

@lukaszgryglicki For now, github.com/open-gitops is probably best for devstats, since it's the sandbox project. Note that there is a CNCF service desk ticket and github support ticket to be given ownership of the unused "opengitops" (all one word) github repo. If/when we do, devstats should point there. However if we do, we will set up a proper github redirect, so it should work regardless 😄

@poconnor1 does CNCF have specific requirements for website analytics? We are working on getting a website up and running. @todaywasawesome is leading that now.

The trademark and account assignment is in progress, tracked by this CNCF Service Desk ticket ⏳ 😸

@amye Artwork is merged, but are we waiting for trademark and assignments to complete before updating the CNCF landscape and website? https://www.cncf.io/sandbox-projects/ Just checking

Thanks everyone for your patience and support so far! Excited to see this onboarding wrap up 😅

OK I'll use this in DevStats pages.

@scottrigby: Updating here: "Trademarks: transfer any trademark and logo mark assets over to the LF" - this is still over in our queue.
We've got a separate conversation going for analytics, but Google Analytics is our preference.

Renaming issue to reflect the actual name of the group.

@scottrigby - this can be closed if we have the final trademark paperwork signed, see Servicedesk!

And complete here!