Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Survive or Thrive? Longitudinal Relation Between Chronic Pain and Well-Being

  • Published:
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The minimal literature on the relation between chronic pain and both eudaimonic (EWB) and hedonic well-being (HWB) examines the relation cross-sectionally, and most studies have examined chronic pain’s effect only on psychopathology.

Methods

Using a sample of 473 midlife and older adults with chronic pain, this study examined both the cross-sectional and longitudinal relations between chronic pain and EWB and HWB in addition to psychological distress.

Results

Multiple-group longitudinal structural equation modeling revealed that chronic pain was related significantly and negatively to EWB and HWB, and significantly and positively to distress among both men and women. When examined longitudinally, chronic pain at time 1 was associated significantly only with decreased EWB at time 2, suggesting chronic pain’s risk to psychological functioning, especially because of its long-term effects on future EWB.

Conclusions

Our study provides a comprehensive picture of the way chronic pain is associated both with EWB and HWB, in addition to psychological distress. Further, chronic pain may have a lasting influence on EWB, while it may have little predictive value for future HWB and psychological distress. Our study supports well-being’s relevance to chronic pain research and has the potential to guide prevention strategies and treatment for chronic pain using a positive psychological framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Treede RD, Rief W, Barke A, Aziz Q, Bennett MI, Benoliel R, et al. A classification of chronic pain for ICD-11. Pain. 2015;156:1003–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Gaskin DJ, Richard P. The economic costs of pain in the United States. J Pain. 2012;13:715–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gatchel RJ, Peng YB, Peters ML, Fuchs PN, Turk DC. The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: scientific advances and future directions. Psychol Bull. 2007;133:581–624.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gatchel RJ. Comorbidity of chronic pain and mental health disorders: the biopsychosocial perspective. Am Psychol. 2004;59:795–805.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Huber A, Suman AL, Biasi G, Carli G. Predictors of psychological distress and well-being in women with chronic musculoskeletal pain: two sides of the same coin? J Psychosom Res. 2008;64:169–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McBeth J, Macfarlane GJ, Silman AJ. Does chronic pain predict future psychological distress? Pain. 2002;96:239–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Karapetyan AA, Manvelyan HM. Chronic pain and depression. In: Breznoscakova D, editor. Depression. London, United Kingdom: InTech; 2017. p. 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Meeks TW, Dunn LB, Kim DS, Golshan S, Sewell DD, Atkinson JH, et al. Chronic pain and depression among geriatric psychiatry inpatients. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008;23:637–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tsang A, Von Korff M, Lee S, Alonso J, Karam E, Angermeyer MC, et al. Common chronic pain conditions in developed and developing countries: gender and age differences and comorbidity with depression-anxiety disorders. J Pain. 2008;9:883–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carleton RN, Afifi TO, Taillieu T, Turner S, El-Gabalawy R, Sareen J, et al. Anxiety-related psychopathology and chronic pain comorbidity among public safety personnel. J Anxiety Disord. 2018;55:48–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Diener E. Hedonic well-being. Psychol Bull. 1984;95:542–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ryan RM, Deci EL. On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:141–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Diener E, Suh EM, Lucas RE, Smith HL. Hedonic well-being: three decades of progress. Psychol Bull. 1999;125:276–302.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carruthers CP, Hood CD. The power of the positive: leisure and well-being. Ther Recreat J. 2004;38:225–45.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Compton WC, Smith ML, Cornish KA, Qualls DL. Factor structure of mental health measures. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;71:406–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Baker TA, Buchanan NT, Small BJ, Hines RD, Whitfield KE. Identifying the relationship between chronic pain, depression, and life satisfaction in older African Americans. Res Aging. 2011;33:426–43.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dezutter J, Robertson LA, Luyckx K, Hutsebaut D. Life satisfaction in chronic pain patients: the stress-buffering role of the centrality of religion. J Sci Study Relig. 2010;49:507–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dezutter J, Luyckx K, Wachholtz A. Meaning in life in chronic pain patients over time: associations with pain experience and psychological well-being. J Behav Med. 2015;38:384–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mangelli L, Gribbin N, Büchi S, Allard S, Sensky T. Psychological well-being in rheumatoid arthritis: relationship to ‘disease’ variables and affective disturbance. Psychother Psychosom. 2002;71:112–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Huppert FA. Psychological well-being: evidence regarding its causes and consequences. App Psychol Health Well Being. 2009;1:137–64.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Greenspoon PJ, Saklofske DH. Toward an integration of hedonic well-being and psychopathology. Soc Indic Res. 2001;54:81–108.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nes RB, Czajkowski N, Roysamb E, Reichborn-Kjennerud T, Tambs K. Well-being and ill-being: shared environments, shared genes? J Posit Psychol. 2008;3:253–65.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ryff CD, Love GD, Urry HL, Muller D, Rosenkranz MA, Friedman EM, et al. Psychological well-being and ill-being: do they have distinct or mirrored biological correlates? Psychother Psychosom. 2006;75:85–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. McWilliams LA, Goodwin RD, Cox BJ. Depression and anxiety associated with three pain conditions: results from a nationally representative sample. Pain. 2004;111:77–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rustøen T, Wahl AK, Hanestad BR, Lerdal A, Paul S, Miaskowski C. Gender differences in chronic pain—findings from a population-based study of Norwegian adults. Pain Manag Nurs. 2004;5:105–17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ryff CD. Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989;57:1069.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ryff CD, Keyes CL. The structure of psychological well-being revisited. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;69:719–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. McEwen BS, Stellar E. Stress and the individual: mechanisms leading to disease. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:2093–101.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Brim OG, Baltes, PB, Bumpass LL, et al. National survey of midlife development in the United States (MIDUS 1), 1995-1996 [Data file]. Inter-university Consortium for Politcal and Social Research: Ann Arbor, Michigan; 1995–1996 [Cited 22 mar 2018]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02760.v14.

  30. Ryff C, Almeida DM, Ayanian, J, et al. National survey of midlife development in the United States (MIDUS II), 2004-2006 [Data file]. Inter-university Consortium for Politcal and Social Research: Ann Arbor, Michigan; 2004–2006 [Cited 22 mar 2018]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04652.v7.

  31. Ryff C, Almeida DM, Ayanian J, et al. National survey of midlife development in the United States (MIDUS 3), 2013-2014 [Data file]. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research: Ann Arbor, Michigan, 2013–2014 [Cited 22 mar 2018]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36346.v6.

  32. Brown TT, Partanen J, Chuong L, Villaverde V, Griffin AC, Mendelson A. Discrimination hurts: the effect of discrimination on the development of chronic pain. Soc Sci Med. 2018;204:1–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the brief pain inventory. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994;23:129–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bjørnnes AK, Rustøen T, Lie I, Watt-Watson J, Leegaard M. Pain characteristics and analgesic intake before and following cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2014;15:47–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cowan DT, Wilson-Barnett DJ, Griffiths P, Vaughan DJA, Gondhia A, Allan LG. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over pilot study to assess the effects of long-term opioid drug consumption and subsequent abstinence in chronic noncancer pain patients receiving controlled-release morphine. Pain Med. 2005;6:113–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Harding G, Schein JR, Nelson WW, Vallow S, Olson WH, Hewitt DJ, et al. Development and validation of a new instrument to evaluate the ease of use of patient-controlled analgesic modalities for postoperative patients. J Med Econ. 2010;13:42–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Raichle KA, Osborne TL, Jensen MP, Cardenas D. The reliability and validity of pain interference measures in persons with spinal cord injury. J Pain. 2006;7:179–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Williams VS, Smith MY, Fehnel SE. The validity and utility of the BPI interference measures for evaluating the impact of osteoarthritic pain. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2006;31:48–57.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bradburn NM. The structure of psychological well-being. Oxford, England: Aldine; 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kessler RC, McGonagle KA, Zhao S, et al. Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States: results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994;51:8–19.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Taylor JA. A personality scale of manifest anxiety. J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1953;48:285–90.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1:385–401.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mroczek DK, Kolarz CM. The effect of age on positive and negative affect: a developmental perspective on happiness. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;75:1333–49.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mickelson KD, Williams DR. The prevalence, distribution, and mental health correlates of perceived discrimination in the United States. J Health Soc Behav. 1999;40:208–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bae W, Ik Suh Y, Ryu J, Heo J. Physical activity levels and well-being in older adults. Psychol Rep. 2017;120:192–205.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Barrineau MJ, Zarit SH, King HA, Costanzo ES, Almeida DM. Daily well-being of cancer survivors: the role of somatic amplification. Psychooncology. 2014;23:1027–33.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Prenda KM, Lachman ME. Planning for the future: a life management strategy for increasing control and life satisfaction in adulthood. Psychol Aging. 2001;16:206–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Diener E, Inglehart R, Tay L. Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Soc Indic Res. 2013;112:497–527.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Lucas RE, Donnellan MB. Estimating the reliability of single-item life satisfaction measures: results from four national panel studies. Soc Indic Res. 2012;105:323–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. McIntosh CN. Report on the construct validity of the temporal satisfaction with life scale. Soc Indic Res. 2001;54:37–56.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Lucas RE, Diener E, Suh E. Discriminant validity of well-being measures. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;71:616–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Diener E, Chan MY. Happy people live longer: subjective well-being contributes to health and longevity. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2011;3:1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Brim OG, Ryff CD, Kessler RC. How healthy are we? A national study of well-being in midlife. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Busseri MA. Toward a resolution of the tripartite structure of hedonic well-being. J Pers. 2015;83:413–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-3. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  56. World Health Organization. Composite international diagnostic interview, CIDI, version 10. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Wittchen HU. Reliability and validity studies of the WHO-composite international diagnostic interview (CIDI): a critical review. J Psychiatr Res. 1994;28:57–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Aalto-Setälä T, Haarasilta L, Marttunen M, Tuulio-Henriksson A, Poikolainen K, Aro H, et al. Major depressive episode among young adults: CIDI-SF versus SCAN consensus diagnoses. Psychol Med. 2002;32:1309–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Kessler RC, Andrews G, Mroczek D, Ustun B, Wittchen HU. The World Health Organization composite international diagnostic interview short-form (CIDI-SF). Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 1998;7:171–85.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Karlson CW, Gallagher MW, Olson CA, Hamilton NA. Insomnia symptoms and well-being: longitudinal follow-up. Health Psychol. 2013;32:311–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Benyamini Y, Leventhal EA, Leventhal H. Self-assessments of health: what do people know that predicts their mortality? Res Aging. 1999;21:477–500.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Little TD. Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York City: Guilford Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Widaman KF, Thompson JS. On specifying the null model for incremental fit indices in structural equation modeling. Psychol Methods. 2003;8:16–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Kline RB. Software review: software programs for structural equation modeling: Amos, EQS, and LISREL. J Psychoeduc Assess. 1998;16:343–64.

    Google Scholar 

  65. MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol Methods. 1996;1:130–49.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Equ Model. 2002;9:233–55.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Huta V, Ryan RM. Pursuing pleasure or virtue: the differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. J Happiness Stud. 2010;11:735–62.

    Google Scholar 

  69. McMahan EA, Estes D. Hedonic versus eudaimonic conceptions of well-being: evidence of differential associations with self-reported well-being. Soc Indic Res. 2011;103:93–108.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Pavot W, Diener E. The affective and cognitive context of self-reported measures of hedonic well-being. Soc Indic Res. 1993;28:1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Vlaeyen JW, Morley S, Crombez G. The experimental analysis of the interruptive, interfering, and identity-distorting effects of chronic pain. Beh Res Ther. 2016;86:23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Seligman ME, Csikszentmihalyi M. Positive psychology: an introduction. Am Psychol. 2000;55:5–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Magyar-Moe JL, Owens RL, Conoley CW. Positive psychological interventions in counseling: what every counseling psychologist should know. J Couns Psychol. 2015;43:508–57.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Smith EJ. The strength-based counseling model. Couns Psychol. 2006;34:13–79.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Wong YJ. Strength-centered therapy: a social constructionist, virtues-based psychotherapy. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2006;43:133–46.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Frisch MB. Quality of life therapy: applying a life satisfaction approach to positive psychology and cognitive therapy. New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Ruini C, Fava GA. Clinical applications of well-being therapy. In: Linley PA, Joseph S, editors. Positive psychology in practice. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2004. p. 371–87.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Lopez SJ, Floyd RK, Ulven JC, Snyder CR. Hope therapy: helping clients build a house of hope. In: Snyder CR, editor. Handbook of hope: theory, measures, and applications. San Diego: Academic Press; 2000. p. 123–50.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Rashid T, Anjum A. Positive psychotherapy for young adults and children. In: Abela JRZ, Hankin BL, editors. Handbook of depression in children and adolescents. New York City: Guilford Press; 2008. p. 250–87.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Müller R, Gertz KJ, Molton IR, Terrill AL, Bombardier CH, Ehde DM, et al. Effects of a tailored positive psychology intervention on well-being and pain in individuals with chronic pain and a physical disability. Clin J Pain. 2016;32:32–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Peters ML, Smeets E, Feijge M, van Breukelen G, Andersson G, Buhrman M, et al. Happy despite pain: a randomized controlled trial of an 8-week internet-delivered positive psychology intervention for enhancing well-being in patients with chronic pain. Clin J Pain. 2017;33:962–75.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Hausmann LR, Youk A, Kwoh CK, Gallagher RM, Weiner DK, Vina ER, et al. Effect of a positive psychological intervention on pain and functional difficulty among adults with osteoarthritis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1:e182533.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Hausmann LR, Youk A, Kwoh CK, Ibrahim SA, Hannon MJ, Weiner DK, et al. Testing a positive psychological intervention for osteoarthritis. Pain Med. 2017;18:1908–20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shin Ye Kim.

Ethics declarations

The study received ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

ESM 1

(DOCX 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, S.Y., Shigemoto, Y. & Neduvelil, A. Survive or Thrive? Longitudinal Relation Between Chronic Pain and Well-Being. Int.J. Behav. Med. 26, 486–498 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-019-09805-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-019-09805-3

Keywords

Navigation