Next Article in Journal
An Environmentally Benign Approach for As (V) Absorption from Wastewater Using Untreated Coffee Grounds—Preliminary Results
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparison of the Results from Microscopic Tests Concerning the Quality of Activated Sludge and Effluent
Previous Article in Journal
Lateral Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity of Soil Horizons Evaluated in Large-Volume Soil Monoliths
Previous Article in Special Issue
Performance of Denitrifying Phosphate Removal via Nitrite from Slaughterhouse Wastewater Treatment at Low Temperature
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cyanobacterial Nitrogen Fixation Influences the Nitrogen Removal Efficiency in a Constructed Wetland

1
Beijing Key Laboratory of Wetland Services and Restoration, Institute of Wetland Research, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
2
School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2017, 9(11), 865; https://doi.org/10.3390/w9110865
Submission received: 18 September 2017 / Revised: 1 November 2017 / Accepted: 3 November 2017 / Published: 7 November 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biological Treatment of Wastewater)

Abstract

:
Nitrogen removal efficiency in constructed wetlands (CW) is influenced by multiple environmental factors. However, little is known about the role of cyanobacterial nitrogen fixation in affecting nitrogen removal efficiency. This study investigated how cyanobacterial nitrogen fixation affects the efficiency, at which a CW removes nitrogen from an associated artificial lake (AL) in Beijing. For this purpose, we measured cell densities of N-fixing and non-N-fixing cyanobacteria, the aquatic nitrogen fixation rate (RNfix), and the concentration of various nitrogen fractions over the growing season (April–November) of 2014 in both AL and CW. We found that the removal of particulate organic nitrogen (PON) contributed to >90% of the total nitrogen removal in the CW. The removal efficiency of PON was lower during August–October (55.45 ± 27.49%) than during April–July (68.86 ± 8.83%). Phytoplankton proliferation in summer, as one of the main sources of PON, may have exceeded the capacity of the CW and led to declines in PON removal efficiency. RNfix peaked in July–October (3–169 ng N·L−1·h−1) and was positively correlated with both PON concentration and the cell density of N-fixing Anabaena sp. over the growing season, suggesting that aquatic nitrogen fixation (primarily in the AL) may increase PON and thereby reduce the its removal efficiency in the CW.

1. Introduction

Constructed wetlands (‘CW’, hereafter) are effective in reducing biological and chemical oxygen consumption, suspended matter, and pollution-related bacteria in waste waters. However, the removal efficiency of nitrogen is usually low (<50%) and variable in CW [1,2]. The nitrogen removal in CW involves complex processes and is influenced by many factors [3]. Total nitrogen (TN) in aquatic systems can be divided into particulate organic nitrogen (PON) and total dissolved nitrogen (TDN). PON mainly consists of bacteria, phytoplankton, sediments, and plant litter [4], while TDN is mainly comprised of dissolved organic nitrogen (DON), ammonia (NH4+-N), and nitrate and nitrite (NOX-N) [5]. PON is an important nitrogen component in aquatic systems, accounting for more than 50% of TN in domestic wastewater, aquaculture wastewater, stormwater, and other sewage sources [5,6,7]. Most constructed wetlands have been designed for removing TDN from sewage through creating conditions for mineralization, nitrification, and denitrification in different segments [8]. Few studies have addressed PON, because it was usually classified into particulate organic matter which can be removed through sedimentation or biofilm adsorption [9]. However, organic nitrogen can transform between particulate and dissolved forms in the flow from sewage sources to CWs, and factors influencing the transformation are still not clear. It is thus necessary to investigate the PON removal in CW for improving the efficiency at which TN is removed.
Some genera of filamentous cyanobacteria are capable of fixing nitrogen by transforming N2 into bioavailable forms, thereby adding new nitrogen into aquatic systems. Cyanobacterial nitrogen fixation is a high-energy-consuming process, and occurs only when bioavailable nitrogen cannot meet the demand by phytoplankton [10]. Most previous studies on cyanobacterial nitrogen fixation have focused on natural ecosystems, some of which were oligotrophic or mesotrophic [11]. The nitrogen fixation in CWs has long been overlooked due to previous findings that cyanobacterial nitrogen fixation is not active in eutrophic waters [1], excepting their symbiosis with Azolla in freshwater ponds and paddy fields [12]. However, abundant Anabaena sp. (a genus of N-fixing cyanobacteria) has been observed in an artificial lake (‘AL’, hereafter) constructed for waterfowl inhabitation and an associated CW in the Beijing Wildlife Rescue and Rehabilitation Center (40°06′ N, 116°43′ E). Therefore, we hypothesized that cyanobacterial nitrogen fixation may play a role in affecting nitrogen removal at this site.
The objective of this study was to investigate how cyanobacterial nitrogen fixation affects the efficiency at which the CW removes nitrogen from the associated AL at the study site. For this purpose, we measured the contents of multiple nitrogen fractions (i.e., PON, DON, NH4+-N, and NOX-N) and their removal efficiencies during the growing season (April–November) of 2014. We also examined the dynamics of nitrogen fixation rate (RNfix) and cell density of both N-fixing and non-N-fixing cyanobacteria. We analyzed the relationships among N-fixing cyanobacteria, RNfix, and the removal efficiency of various nitrogen fractions. This study will demonstrate the effects of nitrogen fixation on nitrogen removal in the CW, and will help improve our understanding of the mechanisms underlying nitrogen removal in wetlands.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site

This study was carried out in the Beijing Wildlife Rescue and Rehabilitation Center, where an AL was constructed for waterfowl inhabitation and an associated CW was constructed for purifying the wastewater from the AL. The AL covers an area of about 1 ha. The water input to the AL is from the Chaobai River basin. The AL cannot itself maintain a good water quality due to the input of food detritus and feces of the waterfowl. Thus, a CW with a total area of 2400 m2 was established adjacent to the AL in order to assist in water purification (Figure 1). Water from the AL was pumped into the CW at a flow rate of 300 m3·d−1, and the average hydraulic retention time was 24 h (see the design of the constructed wetland in Cui [13]). The inflow to the AL was characterized by a total phosphorous (TP) of 0.10–1.98 mg·L−1, a TN of 1.15–19.70 mg·L−1, a TDN of 0.04–0.62 mg·L−1, a DON of 0.72–16.23 mg·L−1, and a pH of 8.04–9.36. The CW has been running well since 2008 [14].

2.2. Sampling

From May to November 2014, four replicated water samples were collected monthly from each of the AL and CW at 0.1 m depth below the water surface for monitoring water quality. For each sample, a volume of 250 mL of water was filtered through a φ25 mm pre-combusted Whatman GF/F filter (450 °C, 5 h). The filters were stored at −20 °C until determination of the accumulated PON. The filtrates were stored at 4 °C, and then used for determining the NH4+-N and NOX-N within a week of sampling. Another sample of 500 mL water was brought back to the laboratory on the same day for immediate determination of RNfix using the 15N2 stable isotope gas tracer method described below. Water samples were also taken biweekly for phytoplankton analysis. A volume of 2 L water was stained in situ with 20 mL Lugol’s reagent and then settled for 48 h, before finally being concentrated into 40 mL solutions. The cell numbers of phytoplankton were counted with an optical microscope at 200× or 400× magnifications. The phytoplankton composition was identified to genus according to Hu [15]. The in situ water temperature was determined using YSI 6820 Multiparameter Instrument (Xylem Inc., White Plains, NY, USA), and the air temperature data was obtained from the China Meteorological Data Network [16].

2.3. Concentration of Nitrogen Fractions

The aquatic PON concentration (ρ(PON)) was determined on the accumulated particulates on the filters. The refrigerant filters were dried at 50 °C for 48 h, and nitrogen content (WN) of the filter was determined using the Flash EA 1112 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, USA). The ρ(PON) (mg∙L−1) was calculated as
ρ ( PON ) = W 1 · W N 100 · A 0 A 1 · 1 V f · 1000
where W1 is the weight (mg) of filter combusted in the Flash element analyzer , WN the nitrogen content (%) of the combusted filter, A0 the total area of the accumulated particulates on the filters (cm2), A1 the tested area of filters (cm2) which was combusted, and Vf the water volume (mL) filtered. The coefficient 1000 transforms the unit mg·mL−1 into mg·L−1.
The aquatic TDN concentration (ρ(TDN)) was determined on the filtrates using the Multi N/C 3100 Analyzer (Analytik Jena AG, Jena, Germany). The concentration of NH4+-N (ρ(NH4+-N)) and NOX-N (ρ(NOX-N)) were determined on the filtrates using the SmartChem® 200 Discrete Analyzer (WESTCO Scientific Instruments Inc., Brookfield, CT, USA). The aquatic DON concentration (ρ(DON)) was calculated as the difference between TDN and inorganic nitrogen (i.e., NH4+-N + NOX-N). The removal efficiency of a nitrogen component r(N) (%) was calculated as
r ( N ) = ρ ( N ) ¯ A L ρ ( N ) ¯ C W ρ ( N ) ¯ A L · 100 %
where ρ ( N ) ¯ C W is the mean nitrogen content in CW and ρ ( N ) ¯ A L the mean nitrogen content in AL.

2.4. Nitrogen Fixation Rate

The RNfix was determined using the 15N2 stable isotope gas tracer method [15]. For each sample, two 250 mL serum bottles were filled with water samples to overflow, and then were sealed with rubber caps. Afterwards, 0.5 mL of 15N2 gas (99.9%) was injected into one bottle, and the bottles were shaken for 1 h to make sure that 15N2 was well dissolved in water. The labeled bottles and control bottles were incubated at 25 °C for 24 h with 12 h:12 h, light:dark. When the incubation was completed, water in the bottles were filtered through a φ25 mm pre-combusted Whatman GF/F filter (450 °C, 5 h), and the filters were stored at −20 °C for subsequent measurements. The refrigerant filters were dried at 50 °C for 48 h before 15N abundance was determined using Finnigan DELTAplus XP (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA ). The RNfix (ng N·L−1·h−1) was estimated according to Montoya [17]
R Nfix = ( 1 t ) · ( A P N f A P N 0 A N 2 A P N 0 ) · ( ρ ( P O N ) 0 + ρ ( P O N ) f 2 )
where ∆t is the incubation time (h), APNf the 15N enrichment of particulate N at the end of incubation, APN0 the 15N enrichment of particulate N at the start of incubation, and AN2 the 15N enrichment of the N2 available for fixation, ρ(PON)0 and ρ(PON)f the initial and final of PON concentration of the solution(ng N·L−1).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (mean ± SD). Variables were compared between the AL and CW with paired t-test. The effects of months and sites (AL vs. CW) on the aquatic nitrogen fixation were tested using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Pearson correlation coefficient was used to investigate the relationship between nitrogen fixation rates and water chemistry parameters. The concentration of nitrogen fractions and cell densities of phytoplankton were log transformed, and the RNfix were sine transfromed to meet the requirements of these parametric tests. All data analysis was performed using R 3.2.2 [18].

3. Results

3.1. Concentration of Nitrogen Forms

The concentrations of TN (ρ(TN)) and PON in AL were significantly higher than those in the CW (TN: n = 32, t = 6.19, p < 0.001, Figure 2a; PON: n = 32, t = 9.75, p < 0.001, Figure 2b). During April–July, PON accounted for 47.83 ± 0.10% and 20.92 ± 8.30% of TN in the AL and CW, respectively (S1). During August–November, ρ(PON) in the AL and CW increased and achieved the highest values in September (Figure 2b), accounting for 86.93 ± 7.71% and 65.82 ± 15.92% of TN in the AL and CW, respectively (S1). Conversely, the concentration of ρ(TDN) was higher in the CW than that in the AL (n = 32, t = −2.90, p < 0.01, Figure 2c). The ρ(TDN) was higher during April–June, and decreased during July–October in both AL and CW. The ρ(TN) was positively correlated with ρ(PON) (n = 64, r = 0.94, p < 0.001), but was not correlated with ρ(TDN) (n = 64, r = −0.06, p > 0.05).
Among the fractions of TDN, the ρ(NH4+-N) was higher in the AL than that in the CW (n = 32, t = −3.00, p < 0.01, Figure 2e), but there was no significant difference of ρ(DON) and ρ(NOX-N) between the AL and CW (DON: n = 32, t = −1.09, p > 0.05, Figure 2d; NOX-N: n = 32, t = 0.56, p > 0.05, Figure 2f). The ρ(NOX-N) was two to six times higher than ρ(NH4+-N). During April–July, DON accounted for 28.46 ± 11.19% and 54.47 ± 10.74% of TN in the AL and CW (S1). The proportions of DON in TN decreased during August–October, accounting for 5.21 ± 2.08% and 17.38 ± 14.28% of TN in the AL and CW, respectively (S1).

3.2. Nitrogen Removal Efficiency by CW

The average removal efficiency of TN by the CW was 35.22 ± 21.18% during the study period (Figure 3a). The removal efficiency of PON by the CW was 60.22 ± 97.97% during the study period, being higher during April–July (68.86 ± 8.83%) than during August–October (55.45 ± 27.49%) (Figure 3a). The CW led to a reduction of ρ(PON) in the AL by 0.04–5.19 mg·L−1, accounting for more than 90% of the decrease in ρ(TN) (0.07–4.19 mg·L−1).
The removal efficiency of PON was significantly higher than that of TDN (n = 8, t = 5.63, p < 0.001, Figure 3a). The CW did not efficiently remove TDN, as indicated by the average change in TDN of −16.40 ± 27.88% from the AL to CW during the study period (Figure 3b). Among of the fractions of TDN, the removal efficiency of DON and NOX-N fluctuated in the range of −102.40%–66.87%, and did not significantly differ from 0 (DON: n = 8, t = −1.38, p = 0.209; NOX-N: n = 8, t = 0.47, p = 0.650). Meanwhile, the removal of NH4+-N varied widely over a range of −699–50%, which was significantly negative (n = 8, t = −1.96, p < 0.05), and dropped to the lowest value in September (Figure 3b). The water temperature and the daily maximum air temperature (S2) were negatively correlated with the PON removal efficiency, but not with the other nitrogen fractions (S4).

3.3. Cell Density of N-Fixing and Non-Nitrogen Fixing Cyanobacteria

The cell density of phytoplankton in the AL was 3–300 times higher than that in the CW (Figure 4a). Cyanophyta was the most dominant class, accounting for 56.88 ± 36.24% and 29.84 ± 36.62% of the total phytoplankton cells in the AL and CW, respectively. N-fixing Anabeana sp. and non-N-fixing Microcystis sp. were the dominant genera of Cyanophyta, accounting for 52.3 ± 46.7% and 42.3 ± 45.5% of Cyanophyta. Other observed classes of phytoplankton included Chlorophyta, Bacillariophyta, and Pyrrophyta (S3).
The average cell densities of Anabaena sp. and Microcystis sp. in the CW were lower than those in AL (Anabaena sp.: n = 32, t = 4.09, p < 0.01; Microcystis sp.: n = 32, t = 9.85, p < 0.001, Figure 4b,c). The dynamics of Anabaena sp. and Microcystis sp. showed periodic fluctuations in both AL and CW (Figure 4b,c). The density of Anabaena sp. in the AL achieved peaks in May and September, fluctuating in the range 1.41 × 107–86.76 × 107 cells·L−1 during April–September, and accounting for 6.4–98.5% of total phytoplankton cells (S3). The density of Microcystis sp. during June–August (0.38 × 108–3.29 × 108 cells·L−1) was higher than that in other months in the AL, accounting for 31.8–89.9% of total phytoplankton cells.
The ρ(PON) and ρ(DON) were positively correlated with the cell density of total phytoplankton and of Anabaena sp. in both AL and CW, but were not correlated with the cell density of Microcystis sp. (S5). The ρ(NH4+-N) showed negative correlations with the cell density of total phytoplankton and of Anabaena sp. in the AL, but these relationships turned positive in the CW (S5). The daily maximum and minimum air temperature showed positively correlation with the cell density of Microcystis sp. in the CW, but neither with the Anabaena sp. nor total phytoplanktons (S4). Furthermore, no significant relationship was observed between the cell density of phytoplankton and the removal efficiency of nitrogen fractions, except for the negative correlation between the removal efficiency of PON and the cell density of Microcystis sp. in the AL (S6).

3.4. Nitrogen Fixation Rate

The RNfix in water varied over the growing season and between sites (site: F1,48 = 8.62, p < 0.01; month: F7,48 = 4.41, p < 0.001; site × month: F7,48 = 8.98, p < 0.001). The RNfix in the AL reached the highest value of 169.00 ± 65.98 ng N·L−1·h−1 in September, and maintained a high level (1.74–8.92 ng N·L−1·h−1) from August to October (Figure 5). However, RNfix in AL were lower than 0.30 ng N·L−1·h−1 in other months. RNfix in the CW was lower than 0.20 ng N·L−1·h−1 during April–July, and plateaued at a high average rate of 5.93 ± 4.89 ng N·L−1·h−1 during August–November (Figure 5). The highest rate of RNfix in CW (12.14 ± 8.60 ng N·L−1·h−1) occurred in September. RNfix was positively correlated with ρ(PON), ρ(DON), and the cell density of Anabaena sp. in both AL and CW (Table 1). Moreover, RNfix in the CW was positively correlated with ρ(NH4+-N) and total phytoplankton (Table 1).

4. Discussion

4.1. Dynamics of Nitrogen Removal Efficiency

In this study, the removal of TN by the CW was primarily due to the decreases in PON, which accounted for more than 90% of TN removal (Figure 3a). The PON in the AL was primarily composed of food debris and excreta produced by birds, plant litter, algae, and other microorganisms [4]. These sources of PON are usually higher in aquaculture wastewater, domestic wastewater, and storm runoff [5]. The removal efficiency of PON was lower during August–October than during April–July (Figure 3a). The key factor limiting the PON removal efficiency was the capacity of the CW during April–July, but turned into the cell density of phytoplankton in both the AL and CW during August–October. As one of the main sources of PON in wastewater, phytoplankton may have proliferated in the summer in the AL to a point beyond the capacity of the CW. This can lead to declines in PON removal efficiency. Particulate matter, whose concentration is generally reduced through sedimentation and adsorption, can be removed more efficiently with a longer hydraulic retention time (generally longer than 3–5 days [6]). However, the methods promoting sedimentation and adsorption may not be effective in removing PON in the studied system, especially in removing phytoplankton. A longer hydraulic retention time may even increase the phytoplankton cell densities, because the phytoplankton could actively grow in the CW during the summer.
The removal of TDN by CW was not as efficient as the removal of PON (Figure 3a). Among the fractions of TDN, DON and its proportion in TDN showed a decreasing trend from spring to summer (Figure 2d; S1). DON was probably rapidly decomposed under rising temperature and microbial activities [19], thereby leading to increases in ρ(NH4+-N) and ρ(NOX-N) during the wastewater flowing through the CW (Figure 2e,f). Therefore, in the studied system the transformation from DON to inorganic nitrogen may cause declines in the removal efficiency of TDN (Figure 3b), as inorganic nitrogen was known as the most difficult form of nitrogen to remove from the CW [1].

4.2. Dynamics of N-Fixing and Non-N-Fixing Cyanobacteria

The Anabaena sp. and Microcystis sp. bloomed alternately (>2 × 107 cells·L−1) in both AL and CW (Figure 4b,c). Similar dynamics were observed in natural lakes, such as the Iron Gate and Copco reservoirs in California [20] and the Mendota Lake in Wisconsin [21]. In those aquatic systems, Microcystis spp. broke out following the bloom of Aphanizomenon spp., which is an N-fixing genus of Cyanobacteria. Generally, N-fixing cyanobacteria usually proliferated in early spring and autumn [22,23]. The optimal temperature of N-fixing cyanobacteria (20–25 °C, e.g., Anabaena spp. and Aphanizomenon spp.) is generally lower than that of Microcystis spp. (25–30 °C) [24,25]. Such differences in optimal temperature may result in their alternate proliferation. For example, the alternately blooming of N-fixing and non-N-fixing cyanobacteria has been reported for Dianchi Lake [26] and Erhai Lake [27] in China, where suitable temperatures last long enough for the proliferation of N-fixing cyanobacteria. However, blooms of N-fixing cyanobacteria have barely been observed in East China, where temperatures usually increase rapidly in the spring and Microcystis populations develop in aquatic systems over a short time [28].
The site of this study was located in the north China, where so far no N-fixing cyanobacteria blooms had been reported. The daily average air temperature of the study site remained between 17.1 °C and 25.1 °C between April and June in 2014 [S2], which might be a suitable period for Anabaena sp. proliferation. The daily average air temperature increased to above 25 °C during July–August, when the cell density of Microcystis sp. increased (Figure 4b). When the air temperature decreased to ~20 °C in September, the cell density of Anabaena sp. increased again and reached the highest points in both AL and CW (Figure 4b,c). The cell density of phytoplankton in the AL was correlated with neither air nor water temperature (S4). Therefore, the growth of Anabaena sp. and Microcystis sp. may be activated when temperature rises above a threshold [29], but may not be so when continued warming occurs. However, the air temperature was positively correlated with the density of Microcystis sp. in the CW, and was negatively correlated with the PON removal efficiency (S4). This implied that high air temperature may facilitate the proliferation of Microcystis sp. in the CW, and thereby reduce the PON removal efficiency. Therefore, fluctuations in the cell densities of Anabaena sp. and Microcystis sp. were largely driven by temperature at the study site.

4.3. Relationships among Nitrogen Fixation, N-Fixing Cyanobacteria, and PON Removal

Our finding is consistent with Patoine [30] showing that nitrogen fixation increased PON in aquatic ecosystems in the Canadian Great Plains. RNfix at our site averaged 12.14 ± 8.60 ng N·L−1·h−1 during August–November, and the highest RNfix in AL was 169.00 ± 65.98 ng N·L−1·h−1. This value is close to the RNfix in the Baltic Sea and Pacific Ocean, where N2 was the primary nitrogen source [31,32]. The observed positive RNfixρ(PON), RNfixAnabaena sp., and RNfix–phytoplankton relationships (Table 1) suggested that the new nitrogen fixed by Anabaena sp. contributed a large proportion of PON in the study site.
The nitrogen added by the Anabaena sp. could promote the proliferation of Microcystis sp. [22,33]. Since Anabaena sp. showed a positive correlation with ρ(DON) (S3), the proliferated Anabaena sp. in the early-growing season was probably decomposed into dissolved nitrogen in the summer, and supplied available nitrogen for the subsequent bloom of Microcystis sp. in the AL. Furthermore, Microcystis sp. in the AL was negatively correlated with the removal efficiency of PON (S6), suggesting that Microcystis sp. may have exceeded the capacity of the CW and led to a lower PON removal efficiency in summer (Figure 3a). Therefore, we speculated that the nitrogen fixation by N-fixing Cyanobacteria may reduce the PON removal in the CW in summer, through supplying available nitrogen for non-N-fixing phytoplankton.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the PON was a major fraction of the total nitrogen in the AL, and the cyanobacteria, which may be toxic for other aquatic organisms, was an important component of PON. Therefore, PON removal should be considered a priority. Our results showed that the PON contributed to more than 90% of the removal of TN in the study site. The removal efficiency of PON was lower in the summer than in the spring. Phytoplankton proliferation in summer, as one of the main sources of PON, may have exceeded the capacity of the CW and led to declines in PON removal efficiency. The nitrogen fixed by Anabaena sp. was likely used by Microcystis sp., promoting the summer Microcystis sp. blooms in AL. Such blooms increased ρ(PON) in wastewater, and thus reduced the PON removal efficiency of the CW. Therefore, we concluded that the nitrogen fixation by cyanobacteria could reduce the nitrogen removal efficiency in the CW in the summer. Studies on phytoplankton management will greatly assist in the removal of TN in the CW, especially in the culture ponds and paddy fields with abundant N-fixing cyanobacteria.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/9/11/865/s1, Figure S1: Relative abundance of nitrogen forms in (a) the artificial lake (AL) and (b) the constructed wetland (CW), Figure S2: The (a) water temperature and (b) air temperature in the study site. Figure S3: Relative abundance of phytoplankton classes in (a) the artificial lake (AL) and (b) the constructed wetland (CW), Table S4: Pearson correlation coefficients between temperature and the cell densities and nitrogen removal efficiency, Table S5: Pearson correlation coefficients between cell densities of phytoplankton and nitrogen forms in the artificial lake (AL) and the constructed wetland (CW), Table S6: Pearson correlation coefficients between cell densities of phytoplankton and removal efficiency of nitrogen forms in the artificial lake (AL) and the constructed wetland (CW).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Non-Profit Research Institution of CAF (CAFYBB2014QB025), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31770511, 31300400).

Author Contributions

Xiaodong Zhang and Lijuan Cui conceived and designed the experiments; Xiaodong Zhang performed the experiments; Xiaodong Zhang and Liang Yan analyzed the data; Jinzhi Wang and Xiaoming Kang contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; Xiaodong Zhang and Xin Jia wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Vymazal, J. Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Sci. Total Environ. 2007, 380, 48–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Vergeles, Y.; Vystavna, Y.; Ishchenko, A.; Rybalka, I.; Marchand, L.; Stolberg, F. Assessment of treatment efficiency of constructed wetlands in East Ukraine. Ecol. Eng. 2015, 83, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Saeed, T.; Sun, G. A review on nitrogen and organics removal mechanisms in subsurface flow constructed wetlands: Dependency on environmental parameters, operating conditions and supporting media. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 112, 429–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhang, J.; Zhou, Q.; He, R. Mechanism of nitrogen and phosphorus removal in free-water surface constructed wetland. Ecol. Environ. 2004, 13, 98–101. [Google Scholar]
  5. Taylor, G.D.; Fletcher, T.D.; Wong, T.H.F.; Breen, P.F.; Duncan, H.P. Nitrogen composition in urban runoff-implications for stormwater management. Water Res. 2005, 39, 1982–1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Dunne, E.J.; Coveney, M.F.; Marzolf, E.R.; Hoge, V.R.; Conrow, R.; Naleway, R.; Lowe, E.F.; Battoe, L.E.; Inglett, P.W. Nitrogen dynamics of a large-scale constructed wetland used to remove excess nitrogen from eutrophic lake water. Ecol. Eng. 2013, 61, 224–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Taylor, P.G.; Wieder, W.R.; Weintraub, S.; Cohen, S.; Cleveland, C.C.; Townsend, A.R. Organic forms dominate hydrologic nitrogen export from a lowland tropical watershed. Ecology 2015, 96, 1229–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wu, S.; Kuschk, P.; Brix, H.; Vymazal, J.; Dong, R. Development of constructed wetlands in performance intensifications for wastewater treatment: A nitrogen and organic matter targeted review. Water Res. 2014, 57, 40–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lee, C.G.; Fletcher, T.D.; Sun, G.Z. Nitrogen removal in constructed wetland systems. Eng. Life Sci. 2009, 9, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kalff, J. Limnology: Inland Water Eosystems; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ye, L.L.; Zhang, M.; Kong, F.X.; Yang, Z.; Shi, X.L.; Yan, D.Z.; Liu, B. Progress and prospect of research on cyanobacteria nitrogen fixing in aquatic ecosystem. J. Lake Sci. 2014, 26, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yadav, R.K.; Abraham, G.; Singh, Y.V.; Singh, P.K. Advancements in the Utilization of Azolla-anabaena System in Relation to Sustainable Agricultural Practices. Proc. Indian Natl. Sci. Acad. 2014, 80, 301–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cui, L.J.; Li, W.; Zhang, M.Y.; Zhao, X.S.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.F. Effects of waterfowl sewage treatment by integrated artificial wetland running for 2 years. Trans. CSAE 2011, 27, 234–240. [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhang, Y.; Cui, L.; Li, W.; Zhang, M.Y.; Zhao, X.S.; Wang, Y.F. Performance evaluation of an integrated constructed wetland used to treat a contaminated aquatic environment. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 2014, 22, 493–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hu, H.J.; Wei, Y.X. The Freshwater Algae of China: Systematics, Taxonomy and Ecology; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  16. China Meteorological Data Network. Available online: http://data.cma.cn/site/index.html (accessed on 17 September 2017).
  17. Montoya, J.P.; Voss, M.; Kahler, P.; Capone, D.G. A Simple, High-Precision, High-Sensitivity Tracer Assay for N2 Fixation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1996, 62, 986–993. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2016; Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 17 September 2017).
  19. Zhang, Y.; Huo, S.; Zan, F.; Xi, B.D.; Zhang, J.T. Dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) in seventeen shallow lakes of Eastern China. Environ. Earth Sci. 2015, 74, 4011–4021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Moisander, P.H.; Ochiai, M.; Lincoff, A. Nutrient limitation of Microcystis aeruginosa in northern California Klamath River reservoirs. Harmful Algae 2009, 8, 889–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Beversdorf, L.J.; Miller, T.R.; McMahon, K.D. The role of nitrogen fixation in cyanobacterial bloom toxicity in a temperate, eutrophic lake. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e56103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Tsujimura, S.; Ishikawa, K.; Tsukada, H. Effect of temperature on growth of the cyanobacterium Aphanizomenon flos-aquae in Lake Biwa and Lake Yogo. Phycol. Res. 2001, 49, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Qin, B.Q.; Xu, H.; Dong, B.L. The Principle and Practice of Eutrophic Lake Restoration and Management; Higher Education Press: Beijing, China, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  24. Liu, F.; Feng, M.; Shang, L.; He, Y.Z.; Li, W.C. Effects of temperature on the growth and generation of extracellular organic matter of Microcystis aeruginosa and Anabaena sp. J. Great Lakes Sci. 2014, 26, 780–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yin, Z.K.; Li, Z.; Wang, S.; Guo, J.S.; Xiao, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhang, P. Effect of Light and Temperature on Growth Kinetics of Anabaena flosaquae Under Phosphorus Limitation. Environ. Sci. 2015, 36, 963–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, Y.; Zhang, M.; Wang, R.N. The temporal and spation variation of the cyanobacteria which caused the water bloom in the Dianchi Lake, Kunming, China. J. Yunnan Univ. Nat. Sci. 2005, 27, 272–276. [Google Scholar]
  27. Lv, X.J.; Zhu, J.; Meng, L. Pilot study on diversity of cyanobacteria bloom in Erhai Lake. Envion. Sci. Surv. 2010, 29, 32–35. [Google Scholar]
  28. Paerl, H.W.; Xu, H.; Hall, N.S.; Zhu, G.W.; Qin, B.Q.; Wu, Y.L.; Rossignol, K.L.; Dong, L.H.; McCarthy, M.J.; Joyner, A.R. Controlling cyanobacterial blooms in hypertrophic lake Taihu, China: Will nitrogen reductions cause replacement of non-N2-fixing by N2-fixing taxa? PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e113123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Wilhelm, S.W.; Farnsley, S.E.; LeCleir, G.R.; Layton, A.C.; Satchwell, M.F.; DeBruyn, J.M.; Boyer, G.L.; Zhu, G.W.; Paerl, H.W. The relationships between nutrients, cyanobacterial toxins and the microbial community in Taihu (Lake Tai), China. Harmful Algae 2011, 10, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Patoine, A.; Graham, M.D.; Leavitt, P.R. Spatial variation of nitrogen fixation in lakes of the northern Great Plains. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2006, 51, 1665–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bonnet, S.I.C.; Biegala, I.C.; Dutrieux, P.; Slemons, L.O.; Capone, D.G. Nitrogen fixation in the western equatorial Pacific: Rates, diazotrophic cyanobacterial size class distribution, and biogeochemical significance. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2009, 23, GB3012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ohlendieck, U.; Stuhr, A.; Siegmund, H. Nitrogen fixation by diazotrophic cyanobacteria in the Baltic Sea and transfer of the newly fixed nitrogen to picoplankton organisms. J. Mar. Syst. 2000, 25, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Schindler, D.W.; Hecky, R.E.; Findlay, D.L.; Stainton, M.P.; Parker, B.R.; Paterson, M.J.; Beaty, K.G.; Lyng, M.; Kasian, S.E.M. Eutrophication of lakes cannot be controlled by reducing nitrogen input: Results of a 37-year whole-ecosystem experiment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 11254–11258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The location and design of the study site.
Figure 1. The location and design of the study site.
Water 09 00865 g001
Figure 2. Concentration of nitrogen fractions in in the artificial lake (AL) and the adjacent constructed wetland (CW). (a) Total nitrogen (TN); (b) particulate organic nitrogen (PON); (c) total dissolved nitrogen (TDN); (d) dissolved organic nitrogen (DON); (e) NH4+-N; and (f) NOX-N. All data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (mean ± SD).
Figure 2. Concentration of nitrogen fractions in in the artificial lake (AL) and the adjacent constructed wetland (CW). (a) Total nitrogen (TN); (b) particulate organic nitrogen (PON); (c) total dissolved nitrogen (TDN); (d) dissolved organic nitrogen (DON); (e) NH4+-N; and (f) NOX-N. All data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (mean ± SD).
Water 09 00865 g002
Figure 3. Removal efficiency of nitrogen fractions by the constructed wetland (CW). (a) Total nitrogen (TN), particulate organic nitrogen (PON), and total dissolved nitrogen (TDN); (b) dissolved organic nitrogen (DON), NH4+-N, and NOX-N.
Figure 3. Removal efficiency of nitrogen fractions by the constructed wetland (CW). (a) Total nitrogen (TN), particulate organic nitrogen (PON), and total dissolved nitrogen (TDN); (b) dissolved organic nitrogen (DON), NH4+-N, and NOX-N.
Water 09 00865 g003
Figure 4. The cell density of (a) total phytoplankton, Anabaena sp. and Microcystis sp., in (b) the artificial lake (AL), and (c) the constructed wetland (CW).
Figure 4. The cell density of (a) total phytoplankton, Anabaena sp. and Microcystis sp., in (b) the artificial lake (AL), and (c) the constructed wetland (CW).
Water 09 00865 g004
Figure 5. Nitrogen fixation rate (RNfix) in the artificial lake (AL) and the constructed wetland (CW). Statistical tests were performed using two-way analysis of variance.
Figure 5. Nitrogen fixation rate (RNfix) in the artificial lake (AL) and the constructed wetland (CW). Statistical tests were performed using two-way analysis of variance.
Water 09 00865 g005
Table 1. Pearson correlation coefficients between RNfix and water parameters (*** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05; n = 32). AL represents the artificial lake, CW represents the constructed wetland.
Table 1. Pearson correlation coefficients between RNfix and water parameters (*** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05; n = 32). AL represents the artificial lake, CW represents the constructed wetland.
ρ(PON)ρ(DON)ρ(NH4+-N)ρ(NOX-N)Total PhytoplanktonAnabaena sp.Microcystis sp.
RNfix in AL0.648 ***0.662 ***−0.078−0.2440.3090.467 **−0.259
RNfix in CW0.739 ***0.618 ***0.417 *−0.1070.489 **0.533 **−0.223

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, X.; Jia, X.; Yan, L.; Wang, J.; Kang, X.; Cui, L. Cyanobacterial Nitrogen Fixation Influences the Nitrogen Removal Efficiency in a Constructed Wetland. Water 2017, 9, 865. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9110865

AMA Style

Zhang X, Jia X, Yan L, Wang J, Kang X, Cui L. Cyanobacterial Nitrogen Fixation Influences the Nitrogen Removal Efficiency in a Constructed Wetland. Water. 2017; 9(11):865. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9110865

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Xiaodong, Xin Jia, Liang Yan, Jinzhi Wang, Xiaoming Kang, and Lijuan Cui. 2017. "Cyanobacterial Nitrogen Fixation Influences the Nitrogen Removal Efficiency in a Constructed Wetland" Water 9, no. 11: 865. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9110865

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop